Compare performance (272 HP vs 510 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 51,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or BMW X4?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive market is filled with exceptional vehicles, but few rival the luxurious offerings from Audi and BMW. In this comparison, we pit the Audi Q3 against the BMW X4—a battle of two premium compact SUVs that embody the spirit of innovation and performance.
The Audi Q3 boasts an elegant and modern design, measuring 4484 mm in length, 1849 mm in width, and standing 1585 mm tall. Its sleek lines and bold front grille exude a sporty yet sophisticated aura. On the other hand, the BMW X4, with its more aggressive stance, stretches 4751 mm long, 1918 mm wide, and 1621 mm high. The X4's coupe-like silhouette and muscular proportions give it a commanding presence on the road.
The Audi Q3 offers a variety of engine options, including both petrol and diesel variants, with power outputs ranging from 150 to 245 HP. It also features advanced transmission options with both manual and dual-clutch automatic systems for a driving experience tailored to individual preferences. The Q3 accelerates from 0-100 km/h in as little as 5.8 seconds, showcasing its sporty capabilities.
In contrast, the BMW X4 comes equipped with both petrol and diesel MHEV options, delivering impressive power outputs of up to 510 HP in the high-performance variants. The X4 accelerates from 0-100 km/h in a breathtaking 3.8 seconds, thanks to its advanced engine technology and all-wheel-drive system. With a top speed reaching up to 250 km/h, the X4 is engineered for those who crave thrilling performance.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Audi Q3 shows promise with consumption figures ranging from 5.5 to 8.5 L/100 km, depending on the engine choice. Its CO2 emissions are classified between E and G, making it a decent choice for eco-conscious drivers.
The BMW X4 presents a slightly varied landscape, with efficiency ratings between 6.0 and 10.7 L/100 km. Its CO2 emissions fall in the F and G classes, reflecting the performance-oriented tuning of some engine options. However, for those prioritizing power over fuel efficiency, the X4’s offerings are undeniably enticing.
Inside, the Audi Q3 is designed for comfort, featuring a well-appointed cabin with quality materials and advanced technology. Its infotainment system integrates seamlessly with smartphone connections and offers a user-friendly interface. The Q3 provides ample trunk capacity of 530 L, ensuring that practicality is not sacrificed for style.
The BMW X4 also shines in the interior department, offering a driver-focused layout enhanced by cutting-edge technology. Its trunk capacity of 525 L, coupled with luxurious options, makes for an inviting atmosphere. BMW’s iDrive system is intuitive, providing access to a plethora of features that enhance both convenience and safety.
The decision between the Audi Q3 and BMW X4 ultimately hinges on personal preference and driving style. The Q3 excels with a classic approach to luxury and a range of efficient engines, while the X4 boasts high-performance capabilities with striking aesthetics. Whether you prefer the agile comfort of the Q3 or the exhilarating thrill of the X4, both vehicles deliver a remarkable driving experience in the crowded SUV market.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Audi Q3 is markedly cheaper – starting at 38,200 £ , while the BMW X4 costs 51,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,629 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the BMW X4 with 6 L/100km. The difference is about 4.3 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X4 offers substantially more power – delivering 510 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 238 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X4 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Audi Q3 takes 5.7 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X4 delivers clearly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi Q3 is slightly lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 1,875 kg. The difference is around 240 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BMW X4 offers barely more boot space – 525 L compared to 488 L. That’s a difference of about 37 L.
When it comes to payload, the BMW X4 carries only slightly more – 545 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.
The Audi Q3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.
details
The BMW X4 blends coupe-like styling with SUV practicality, giving you a striking profile that never lets you disappear into traffic. It feels planted and keen behind the wheel, and for buyers who crave personality without sacrificing everyday usability, it’s a compelling and slightly mischievous choice.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
|
Price
51,900 - 93,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6 - 10.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
39 - 195 g/km
|
co2
156 - 244 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
65 - 68 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
|
Curb weight
1,875 - 2,095 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
|
Trunk capacity
525 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,751 - 4,754 mm
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,918 - 1,938 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,620 - 1,621 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,430 L
|
|
Payload
505 - 535 kg
|
Payload
415 - 545 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 510 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
213 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 700 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 375 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
BMW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España