In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and Nissan Qashqai both offer compelling features tailored to different consumer preferences. The Q3 impresses with its luxurious interior and advanced technology, providing a premium driving experience, while the Qashqai stands out for its practicality and value for money. Ultimately, buyers must weigh the Q3's upscale charm against the Qashqai's affordability and spaciousness to determine which model best suits their lifestyle.
The compact SUV segment is growing rapidly, and two prominent contenders vying for supremacy are the Audi Q3 and the Nissan Qashqai. Both vehicles offer a compelling mix of style, innovation, and functionality. However, they have their unique characteristics and technologies that set them apart. In this article, we will dig deep into their technical aspects to help you decide which SUV reigns supreme.
The Audi Q3 boasts a diverse range of engine options, offering both petrol and diesel variants. Power outputs range from 150 HP to an impressive 245 HP, ensuring that there's a choice for every driver. The Q3's turbocharged engines deliver robust torque ranging from 250 Nm to 400 Nm, resulting in swift acceleration. The model can achieve 0-100 km/h in as little as 5.8 seconds, while top speeds can reach up to 237 km/h, depending on the engine configuration.
On the other side, the Nissan Qashqai introduces a blend of petrol MHEV and full hybrid engines, creating a different performance spectrum. Power outputs range from 140 HP to 190 HP, with peak torque hitting 330 Nm. The Qashqai manages 0-100 km/h in 7.9 seconds for its swiftest variant, with a top speed of 206 km/h. Although slightly less powerful than the Q3, the Qashqai leans into efficiency with consumption figures as low as 5.1 L/100km in its hybrid configurations.
Fuel consumption is an essential factor for many drivers. With the Audi Q3, fuel efficiency varies across its engine lineup, with estimates generally around 5.5 to 8.5 L/100km. The diesel variants offer some of the best efficiencies in the lineup. However, the Qashqai shines particularly in this department, with consumption figures as low as 5.1 L/100km for its hybrid models and a CO2 emission range that can go as low as 116 g/km.
In terms of environmental impact, the Qashqai has a slight edge due to its advanced hybrid technology, allowing Nissan to classify its CO2 efficiency as 'D' or better. Conversely, the Q3 sits in classes 'E' and 'F', signaling less environmentally friendly performance metrics compared to its rival.
The interior quality of the Audi Q3 is often lauded as luxurious and sophisticated, showcasing premium materials and high-end finishes. The Q3's trunk capacity stands at 530 liters, offering generous storage for everyday needs. Its robust infotainment system, including the Audi Virtual Cockpit, provides an immersive driving experience with top-tier digital interfaces.
Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai offers a more pragmatic approach to interior comfort. The cabin is spacious, with a focus on usability. The Qashqai provides a slightly smaller trunk capacity of 479-504 liters, depending on the specific model. Infotainment options in the Qashqai include modern connectivity features, but they may lack the polish of Audi's superior technology. However, the Qashqai includes nifty driver-assistance features as standard, including ProPILOT Assist, enhancing the driving experience.
Safety is non-negotiable for vehicles in this segment, and both Audi Q3 and Nissan Qashqai are equipped with a suite of safety technologies. The Q3 incorporates Audi's advanced safety and driver-assistance systems, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and emergency braking. These features blend seamlessly into the high-tech offerings that Audi is known for, providing not just security but also peace of mind.
The Qashqai, trained on Nissan's Safety Shield technology, includes features like intelligent emergency braking, rear cross-traffic alert, and blind-spot warning. While the Qashqai’s offerings are commendable, the Q3’s systems are often seen as more refined and integrated, catering to those who prioritize an all-encompassing luxury experience.
Choosing between the Audi Q3 and Nissan Qashqai ultimately hinges on personal preference. If you seek luxury, powerful performance, and high-end technology, the Audi Q3 is your go-to option. Conversely, if efficiency, practicality, and cost-effectiveness are your priorities, the Nissan Qashqai makes a compelling case.
Both vehicles cater to the specific needs of modern drivers, ensuring that regardless of your ultimate choice, you'll be acquiring a well-engineered SUV that promises comfort, performance, and style. Therefore, it may just boil down to which driving experience resonates more with your lifestyle needs.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 32800 - 45200
£
|
Price
about 29300 - 42400
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 8.5
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.8
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
143 - 193
g/km
|
co2
116 - 154
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 - 60
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1525 - 1735
kg
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665
kg
|
Trunk capacity
530
L
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504
L
|
Length
4484 - 4500
mm
|
Length
4425
mm
|
Width
1843 - 1849
mm
|
Width
1835
mm
|
Height
1567 - 1585
mm
|
Height
1625
mm
|
Payload
455 - 495
kg
|
Payload
466 - 520
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
150 - 245
HP
|
Power HP
140 - 190
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 9.5
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 10.2
s
|
Max Speed
200 - 237
km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 206
km/h
|
Torque
250 - 400
Nm
|
Torque
240 - 330
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
110 - 180
kW
|
Power kW
103 - 140
kW
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1497
cm3
|
Top speed
200 - 237
km/h
|
Top speed
170 - 206
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Nissan
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.