VS

Audi Q3 vs Kia XCeed – Which model is better for everyday use?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Audi Q3 or Kia XCeed?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3 @ audi-mediacenter.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Kia XCeed has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the Audi Q3 costs 38200 £. That’s a price difference of around 15094 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi Q3 manages with 1.70 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.40 L. The difference is about 4.70 L per 100 km.

XCeed @ press.kia.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 has a distinct edge – offering 272 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 92 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.70 s, while the Kia XCeed takes 8.50 s. That’s about 2.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi Q3 performs somewhat better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Kia XCeed tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q3 pulls evident stronger with 400 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 135 Nm difference.

Q3 @ audi-mediacenter.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Kia XCeed is distinct lighter – 1351 kg compared to 1635 kg. The difference is around 284 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Audi Q3 offers somewhat more room – 488 L compared to 426 L. That’s a difference of about 62 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Audi Q3 performs minimal better – up to 1386 L, which is about 8 L more than the Kia XCeed.

When it comes to payload, Audi Q3 a bit takes the win – 535 kg compared to 479 kg. That’s a difference of about 56 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Audi Q3 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Audi Q3 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £38,200
A188605_overfull

Audi Q3

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.7 - 8.6 L
  • Electric Range : 118 - 119 km
details

Audi Q3

5 (1)
rate

The Audi Q3 seamlessly blends practicality with luxury, making it an ideal choice for urban dwellers and adventure seekers alike. With its striking design and sophisticated interior, the Q3 offers a premium driving experience that caters to both comfort and style. As a compact SUV, it effortlessly navigates through city streets while providing ample space for passengers and cargo.

details
A188605_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A188610_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A188613_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A1814467_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A188626_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com

Kia XCeed

The Kia XCeed offers a stylish and modern design, blending the sportiness of a coupé with the practicality of an SUV. Its interior is well-crafted, featuring high-quality materials and a range of advanced technology to enhance the driving experience. With an emphasis on comfort and efficiency, the XCeed provides a compelling option for those seeking a versatile and dynamic vehicle.

details
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_25 @ press.kia.com
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_08 @ press.kia.com
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_21 @ press.kia.com
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_57 @ press.kia.com

Similar Comparisons

Kia Stonic
Kia XCeed
VS
In the city crossover showdown, the Kia Stonic is the cheeky, budget-friendly pocket SUV while the Kia XCeed steps up as the sleeker, more grown-up option with sharper handling and extra space. Pick the Stonic for low running costs and easy parking; go for the XCeed if you want a more planted drive, better refinement and room for weekend gear — at a slightly higher price.
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling and sensible practicality combine to make it the smarter pick if you want SUV looks and fun without paying for the badge.
Audi Q3
Kia XCeed
Q3
XCeed

Costs and Consumption
Price
38200 - 52900 £
Price
23100 - 33000 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L
Consumption L/100km
6.4 - 6.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
39 - 195 g/km
co2
144 - 155 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 60 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1635 - 1900 kg
Curb weight
1351 - 1419 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
426 L
Length
4531 mm
Length
4395 mm
Width
1859 mm
Width
1826 mm
Height
1559 - 1601 mm
Height
1483 - 1495 mm
Max trunk capacity
1196 - 1386 L
Max trunk capacity
1378 L
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
471 - 479 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
115 - 180 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 11.7 s
Max Speed
208 - 240 km/h
Max Speed
182 - 210 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
85 - 132 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Kia

Similar Comparisons

Kia Ceed
Kia XCeed
VS
In the battle between the Kia Ceed and Kia XCeed, both models showcase the brand's commitment to quality and performance, yet cater to different driving preferences. The Ceed offers a sporty hatchback experience with agile handling, while the XCeed presents a more elevated crossover stance, blending versatility with distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between the two comes down to whether you prioritize dynamic driving or a more spacious, commanding position on the road.
Audi Q3
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and CUPRA Terramar stand out with their distinct design and performance characteristics. The Q3 impresses with its polished interior and advanced technology, making it a solid choice for those who prioritize luxury and comfort. Meanwhile, the CUPRA Terramar offers a sportier driving experience, blending dynamic handling with a unique flair that appeals to enthusiast drivers looking for something more spirited.
Kia Niro
Kia XCeed
VS
In the battle of practicality and style, the Kia Niro and Kia XCeed stand out with their unique offerings. The Niro excels in fuel efficiency and eco-friendly technology, appealing to the environmentally conscious driver, while the XCeed boasts a sportier design and elevated driving position for those seeking a more dynamic experience. Ultimately, the choice between these two Kia models comes down to personal preference, with each catering to different lifestyle needs.
Kia XCeed
Nissan Juke
VS
In the latest showdown between compact crossovers, the Kia XCeed and Nissan Juke take center stage with distinctive features that cater to diverse needs. The Kia XCeed impresses with its sleek design and upscale interior, providing a smooth and comfortable ride that appeals to those who value a touch of luxury. On the other hand, the Nissan Juke brings its quirky styling and agile handling to the table, making it a favorite for urban dwellers who crave a spirited drive with a unique character.
Audi Q3
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and Nissan Qashqai both offer compelling features tailored to different consumer preferences. The Q3 impresses with its luxurious interior and advanced technology, providing a premium driving experience, while the Qashqai stands out for its practicality and value for money. Ultimately, buyers must weigh the Q3's upscale charm against the Qashqai's affordability and spaciousness to determine which model best suits their lifestyle.
Audi Q3
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and VW Tayron deliver a blend of style and performance that appeals to a diverse range of buyers. While the Q3 boasts Audi's signature luxury and advanced technology, the Tayron offers practicality and value without sacrificing modern features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models may come down to a buyer's preference for premium aesthetics versus budget-friendly functionality.
Hyundai Kona
Kia XCeed
VS
In the burgeoning world of crossovers, the Hyundai Kona and Kia XCeed offer compelling choices, each with its distinctive strengths. The Hyundai Kona stands out with its bold design and advanced tech features, which appeal to the modern urban driver seeking versatility and style. Meanwhile, the Kia XCeed delivers a more refined ride with a touch of sportiness, meeting the needs of those who desire a balance of practicality and performance in their daily commute.
Kia XCeed
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Is the Audi Q3 offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.