VS

Audi Q3 vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Mitsubishi Space Star?

Audi Q3 vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences

Audi Q3

4.3 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Mitsubishi Space Star

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Space Star is considerably cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,580 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mitsubishi Space Star with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 3.2 L/100km.

Space Star

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers clearly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 201 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 8.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q3 delivers clearly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 298 Nm more.

Q3

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is significantly lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,635 kg. The difference is around 695 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q3 offers clearly more boot space – 488 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 253 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q3 carries markedly more – 535 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 135 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,200
Q3

Audi Q3

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.7 - 8.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 109 - 119 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Audi Q3 and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you value Audi’s upmarket feel and refinement or the T‑Roc’s sharper pricing and practical versatility. This comparison focuses on real-world driving, interior quality, technology and running costs to help you decide which compact …
Audi Q3
Mercedes GLC
VS
The Audi Q3 and Mercedes GLC are two popular luxury SUVs aimed at buyers who want premium style, modern tech and comfortable daily driving. This comparison shows how the Q3 prioritizes sporty handling and a crisp, driver-focused interior while the GLC leans toward a roomier cabin, softer ride and a …
Audi Q3
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 is a compact premium crossover that blends sharp styling with a well-crafted interior, making it an appealing choice for urban drivers who want a touch of luxury. It delivers a composed ride, intuitive tech features and a practical cabin, so it works well as a comfortable daily driver with an upscale feel.

details
A188605_overfull
A188610_overfull
A188613_overfull
A1814467_overfull
A188626_overfull

Reviews Audi Q3

4.3 (4 Reviews)
rate
Del
16 Jun 2026, 12:27:22

Very comfortable and very enjoyable to drive, interior very pleasant. Only missing the automatic controls.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
dd
2 Nov 2025, 22:05:04

Very comfortable. Precise steering. E35 petrol engine, 150 hp — sufficient. Manual gearbox very good and well-geared. Looks very handsome. Very large boot. Premium interior.

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
DSC_2683_low
DSC_6272_low
DSC_8755_low
050_low

Reviews Mitsubishi Space Star

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
Bernard
19 May 2026, 19:43:01

Mitsubishi is more reliable brand, also the mirage /space star is more Fuel efficient than dacia Sandero

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q3
Porsche Macan
VS
Audi Q3 and Porsche Macan go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi Q3 or the Porsche Macan …
Audi Q3
VW Tiguan
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Audi Q3 and the VW Tiguan, both compact SUVs offer a blend of luxury and practicality, but they cater to slightly different audiences. The Q3 excels with its upscale interior and advanced technology features, making it a top choice for those seeking a …
Mitsubishi Colt
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Mitsubishi Colt and Mitsubishi Space Star offer unique appeals to different drivers. The Colt shines with its sporty design and responsive handling, making it an exciting choice for urban driving. Meanwhile, the Space Star prioritizes practicality and fuel …
Audi Q3
Kia Sportage
VS
Comparing the Audi Q3 and the Kia Sportage helps buyers choose between a compact premium SUV that prioritizes refinement and tech, and a mainstream compact that focuses on space, value and practicality. The Q3 impresses with upscale materials, sharper handling and a quieter cabin, while the …
Audi Q3
BMW X3
VS
In the competitive segment of compact luxury SUVs, the Audi Q3 and BMW X3 stand out for their distinct personalities and driving experiences. The Q3 offers a more compact design with a striking interior and advanced tech features, appealing to urban drivers seeking style and connectivity. In …
Hyundai i10
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the battle of compact city cars, the Hyundai i10 impresses with its stylish design and user-friendly tech features, making it a top choice for urban drivers. On the other hand, the Mitsubishi Space Star offers a spacious interior and exceptional fuel efficiency, catering well to those seeking …
Kia Picanto
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
Kia Picanto and Mitsubishi Space Star go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Kia Picanto or …
Audi Q3
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and Skoda Karoq stand out with their distinct character and appeal. While the Q3 offers a luxurious interior and advanced tech features that cater to premium buyers, the Karoq impresses with its practicality and value for money, making it a …
Audi Q3
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption
Price
38,200 - 54,200 £
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
109 - 119 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
39 - 199 g/km
co2
112 - 125 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Length
-
Length
3,845 mm
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,665 mm
Height
-
Height
1,505 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
359 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
71 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
102 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
52 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mitsubishi
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q3 have?

The Audi Q3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.