Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi Q3 vs Nissan X-Trail comparison
Compare performance (272 HP vs 213 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Nissan X-Trail?
Audi Q3 vs Nissan X-Trail: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Q3
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Nissan X-Trail is somewhat cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,071 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 4 L/100km.
X-Trail
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers clearly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 59 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Nissan X-Trail takes 7 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan X-Trail delivers visibly more torque with 525 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 125 Nm more.
Q3
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Audi Q3 is marginally lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 1,668 kg. The difference is around 33 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan X-Trail offers a bit more boot space – 585 L compared to 488 L. That’s a difference of about 97 L.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan X-Trail carries barely more – 574 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £38,200
Audi Q3
Audi Q3
Nissan X-Trail
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q3
The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.
details
Nissan X-Trail
The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.
details
Audi Q3
Nissan X-Trail
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
|
Price
34,200 - 50,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
39 - 195 g/km
|
co2
131 - 161 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
|
Curb weight
1,668 - 1,961 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
|
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,840 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 - 535 kg
|
Payload
432 - 574 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Nissan
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.