VS

Audi Q3 vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 22,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?

Audi Q3 vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van: Key differences

Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • very slightly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Kangoo Compact Van is substantially cheaper – starting at 22,400 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,788 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 3.4 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van offers clearly more range – reaching up to 290 km, about 171 km more than the Audi Q3.

Kangoo Compact Van

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers substantially more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 150 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 11.6 s. That’s about 5.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q3 delivers visibly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.

Q3

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Kangoo Compact Van is very slightly lighter – 1,493 kg compared to 1,635 kg. The difference is around 142 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van carries considerably more – 901 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 366 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q3 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,200
Q3

Audi Q3

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 118 - 119 km
Audi Q3
Renault Kangoo Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.

details

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.

details
Audi Q3
Renault Kangoo Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
Price
22,400 - 37,000 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 20.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Electric Range
270 - 290 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
39 - 195 g/km
co2
0 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
4
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
Curb weight
1,493 - 1,910 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
4,486 - 4,910 mm
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
1,854 - 1,864 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
3,300 - 4,900 L
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
498 - 901 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
75 - 122 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 18.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
132 - 176 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
230 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
55 - 90 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.