Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi Q8 e-tron vs Land Rover Range Rover comparison
Compare performance (503 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (65,100 £ vs 125,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q8 e-tron or Land Rover Range Rover?
Audi Q8 e-tron vs Land Rover Range Rover: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Q8 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Audi Q8 e-tron is significantly cheaper – starting at 65,100 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 125,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 60,171 £.
As for electric range, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers clearly more range – reaching up to 595 km, about 479 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover.
Range Rover
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover offers only slightly more power – delivering 550 HP compared to 503 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q8 e-tron is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover takes 4.6 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q8 e-tron delivers moderately more torque with 973 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 173 Nm more.
Q8 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover is only slightly lighter – 2,504 kg compared to 2,585 kg. The difference is around 81 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers noticeably more boot space – 818 L compared to 569 L. That’s a difference of about 249 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover carries noticeably more – 846 kg compared to 595 kg. That’s a difference of about 251 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q8 e-tron stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £65,100
Audi Q8 e-tron
Audi Q8 e-tron
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q8 e-tron
The Audi Q8 e-tron wraps Audi’s usual premium polish into a quiet, composed electric SUV that feels refined and surprisingly effortless to drive. With a spacious, tech-forward cabin and understated road presence, it’s a practical yet stylish choice for buyers who want electric motoring without losing the dignity of a proper luxury SUV.
details
Land Rover Range Rover
The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
details
Audi Q8 e-tron
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
65,100 - 102,800 £
|
Price
125,200 - 275,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.7 - 26.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
456 - 595 km
|
Electric Range
115 - 116 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
89 - 106 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
62 - 267 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,585 - 2,725 kg
|
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
528 - 569 L
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
|
Length
4,915 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,937 - 1,994 mm
|
Width
2,047 mm
|
|
Height
1,617 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,567 - 1,637 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
515 - 595 kg
|
Payload
645 - 846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
340 - 503 HP
|
Power HP
300 - 550 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
664 - 973 Nm
|
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
250 - 370 kW
|
Power kW
221 - 405 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.