VS

Audi Q8 e-tron vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (503 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (65,100 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q8 e-tron or Mazda CX-5?

Audi Q8 e-tron vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Audi Q8 e-tron

  • substantially more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q8 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-5 is considerably cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Audi Q8 e-tron costs 65,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 35,066 £.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers substantially more power – delivering 503 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 362 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q8 e-tron is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q8 e-tron delivers considerably more torque with 973 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 735 Nm more.

Q8 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is substantially lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 2,585 kg. The difference is around 956 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers a bit more boot space – 569 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 103 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries barely more – 601 kg compared to 595 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q8 e-tron is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £65,100
Q8 e-tron

Audi Q8 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 340 - 503 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 19.7 - 26.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 456 - 595 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Audi Q8 e-tron
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q8 e-tron

The Audi Q8 e-tron wraps Audi’s usual premium polish into a quiet, composed electric SUV that feels refined and surprisingly effortless to drive. With a spacious, tech-forward cabin and understated road presence, it’s a practical yet stylish choice for buyers who want electric motoring without losing the dignity of a proper luxury SUV.

details
A226160_medium
A226925_medium
A226923_medium
A226157_medium
A226870_medium
A226124_medium
A226128_medium

Reviews Audi Q8 e-tron

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
BYD Seal U
Mazda CX-5
VS
BYD Seal U and Mazda CX-5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BYD Seal U or the Mazda CX-5 …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-5 offer distinct experiences for drivers. The Ford Puma, known for its agile handling and sporty design, appeals to those craving a dynamic driving experience in urban environments. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its luxurious …
Mazda CX-5
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Mazda CX-5 and Toyota Corolla Cross, both vehicles showcase distinct strengths tailored to different drivers' preferences. The sporty design and engaging driving dynamics of the CX-5 cater to those seeking a more spirited ride, while the Corolla Cross emphasizes …
Mazda CX-5
VW T-Roc
VS
In the ever-competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and VW T-Roc stand out with their unique blends of performance and style. The Mazda CX-5 impresses with its refined interior and sporty handling, making it a driver's delight on winding roads. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a fun and …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Austral
VS
In the highly competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 continues to stand out with its sleek design, upscale interior, and refined driving dynamics. In contrast, the Renault Austral brings a fresh approach with its modern tech offerings and distinctive European flair, making it a formidable …
Audi Q8 e-tron
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
65,100 - 102,800 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19.7 - 26.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
456 - 595 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
89 - 106 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
157 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,585 - 2,725 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
528 - 569 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
4,915 mm
Length
-
Width
1,937 - 1,994 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
1,617 - 1,683 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,567 - 1,637 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
515 - 595 kg
Payload
566 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
340 - 503 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
200 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
664 - 973 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
250 - 370 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Audi Q8 e-tron?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.