Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi Q8 e-tron vs Mazda CX-60 comparison
Compare performance (503 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (65,100 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q8 e-tron or Mazda CX-60?
Audi Q8 e-tron vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Q8 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda CX-60 is considerably cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Audi Q8 e-tron costs 65,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,386 £.
As for electric range, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers substantially more range – reaching up to 595 km, about 532 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
CX-60
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers clearly more power – delivering 503 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 176 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q8 e-tron is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q8 e-tron delivers considerably more torque with 973 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 423 Nm more.
Q8 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is visibly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,585 kg. The difference is around 695 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers only slightly more boot space – 570 L compared to 569 L. That’s a difference of about 1 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries very slightly more – 612 kg compared to 595 kg. That’s a difference of about 17 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q8 e-tron holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £65,100
Audi Q8 e-tron
Audi Q8 e-tron
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q8 e-tron
The Audi Q8 e-tron wraps Audi’s usual premium polish into a quiet, composed electric SUV that feels refined and surprisingly effortless to drive. With a spacious, tech-forward cabin and understated road presence, it’s a practical yet stylish choice for buyers who want electric motoring without losing the dignity of a proper luxury SUV.
details
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Audi Q8 e-tron
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
65,100 - 102,800 £
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.7 - 26.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
456 - 595 km
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
89 - 106 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,585 - 2,725 kg
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
528 - 569 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
4,915 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,937 - 1,994 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
1,617 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,567 - 1,637 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
515 - 595 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
340 - 503 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
664 - 973 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
250 - 370 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.