Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer vs Hyundai Kona – Which model is better for everyday use?
Two cars, one duel: BMW 2 Series Active Tourer meets Hyundai Kona.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
2 Series Active Tourer
@ BMW Group Press
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Hyundai Kona has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer costs 31000 £. That’s a price difference of around 7971 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: BMW 2 Series Active Tourer manages with 2.90 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Hyundai Kona with 4.60 L. The difference is about 1.70 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Hyundai Kona performs convincingly better – achieving up to 514 km, about 432 km more than the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer.
Kona
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer has a noticeable edge – offering 326 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 108 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 5.50 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 7.80 s. That’s about 2.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer performs somewhat better – reaching 238 km/h, while the Hyundai Kona tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 28 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BMW 2 Series Active Tourer pulls clearly stronger with 477 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 212 Nm difference.
2 Series Active Tourer
@ BMW Group Press
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Hyundai Kona is somewhat lighter – 1370 kg compared to 1545 kg. The difference is around 175 kg.
In terms of boot space, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer offers hardly perceptible more room – 470 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer performs slightly better – up to 1455 L, which is about 155 L more than the Hyundai Kona.
When it comes to payload, BMW 2 Series Active Tourer hardly perceptible takes the win – 505 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.
Who wins the race?
The BMW 2 Series Active Tourer proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £31,000
@ BMW Group Press
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
The BMW 2 Series Active Tourer offers a blend of versatility and modern design, making it an ideal choice for drivers seeking practicality without compromising on style. Its spacious interior and advanced technology features ensure a comfortable and connected driving experience. With a focus on efficiency and performance, this vehicle stands out as a refined option in the compact MPV segment.
details
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
Hyundai Kona
The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.
details
@ Hyundai Motor Company
@ Hyundai Motor Company
@ Hyundai Motor Company
@ Hyundai Motor Company
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
Hyundai Kona
|
@ BMW Group Press
|
@ Hyundai Motor Company
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
31000 - 48000 £
|
Price
23100 - 41600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.9 - 6.2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
82 km
|
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
14.20 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4 kWh
|
|
co2
65 - 140 g/km
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
MPV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1545 - 1920 kg
|
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
406 - 470 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
|
Length
4386 mm
|
Length
4350 - 4385 mm
|
|
Width
1824 mm
|
Width
1825 mm
|
|
Height
1576 mm
|
Height
1580 - 1585 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1370 - 1455 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
|
|
Payload
465 - 505 kg
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 - 326 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 238 km/h
|
Max Speed
162 - 210 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
90 - 240 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1499 - 1998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
What drive types are available for the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.