VS

Hyundai Kona vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Suzuki S-Cross?

Hyundai Kona vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences

Hyundai Kona

4.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • barely more trunk space
details

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Kona

In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Hyundai Kona and Suzuki S-Cross stand out for their unique characteristics, technical prowess, and innovative features. While both vehicles target the same category of consumers seeking a great mix of practicality, style, and performance, they each offer distinct advantages that cater to varying needs and preferences. In this comparison, we’ll explore the technical aspects, innovations, and overall appeal of the Hyundai Kona and Suzuki S-Cross.

S-Cross

Pricing and Value for Money

Starting with price, the Hyundai Kona has a broader price range, with options between €26,400 and €44,990. This range includes various trims and powertrain options, allowing customers to find a wrap-up that suits their budget. In comparison, the Suzuki S-Cross is well-priced between €31,440 and €39,340, offering fewer configurations. This pricing strategy makes the Kona an attractive option for those seeking entry-level features, while the S-Cross appeals to buyers looking for solid features in a more limited range.

Kona

Engine Options and Performance

The Hyundai Kona provides a versatile lineup that includes petrol, full hybrid, and electric engine options. The petrol variants range from a modest 100 HP to a powerful 218 HP, allowing for impressive acceleration and top speeds reaching up to 208 km/h. With a fuel consumption rate starting at 5.7 L/100km, the Kona presents a compelling case for efficiency, especially in its hybrid and electric versions.

On the other hand, the Suzuki S-Cross features a narrower engine range, focusing primarily on full hybrid and petrol mild-hybrid options with power outputs ranging from 116 HP to 129 HP. The S-Cross delivers decent acceleration, reaching 0-100 km/h in approximately 9.5 seconds. While its maximum speed of up to 195 km/h is commendable, the Kona outshines in sheer power and variety.

S-Cross

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

When it comes to fuel efficiency, the S-Cross edges out slightly with a consumption rate as low as 5.1 L/100km, particularly appealing to eco-conscious consumers. The Kona, while competitive at a consumption rate of 5.7 L/100km for its petrol versions, offers a more extensive line of electric and hybrid solutions, boasting an electric range of up to 514 km, thus appealing to those looking into fully electric options.

Kona

Interior Space and Comfort

Both SUVs comfortably accommodate five passengers, but their trunk capacities differ, with the Kona offering an impressive 466 liters compared to the S-Cross’s 430 liters. The increased storage space in the Kona makes it a better option for families or those needing extra cargo capacity. Furthermore, both vehicles provide quality interior finishes, but the Kona’s modern design and layout edge out the S-Cross in terms of contemporary styling.

S-Cross

Technological Innovations

In terms of tech features, the Hyundai Kona shines brightly. It incorporates an intuitive infotainment system with robust smartphone integration, featuring Apple CarPlay and Android Auto as standard across most trims. Additionally, advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) enhance safety on the road, with features such as autonomous emergency braking and lane-keeping assistance.

The Suzuki S-Cross, while also delivering essential tech features, tends to focus more on practical rather than premium technology. Some models come equipped with a decent infotainment system and driver assistance technologies, but fall short compared to the Kona's extensive offerings.

Kona

Conclusion: Choosing the Right SUV

Ultimately, the choice between the Hyundai Kona and Suzuki S-Cross boils down to individual needs and preferences. The Kona impresses with its engine variety, advanced technology, and spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for those seeking versatility and modernity in a small SUV. Conversely, the S-Cross provides a reliable, efficient, and competitively priced option with a straightforward, practical focus. Buyers would do well to consider what aspects—power, efficiency, tech, or capacity—are most important to them when making their decision.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kona

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki S-Cross is barely cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Hyundai Kona costs 23,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,809 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

S-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers substantially more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 94 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai Kona delivers slightly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

Kona

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is marginally lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 90 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers barely more boot space – 466 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 36 L.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries somewhat more – 490 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 85 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,600
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 380 - 510 km
Hyundai Kona
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.

details

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

details
Hyundai Kona
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,600 - 41,900 £
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,825 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Suzuki
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.