In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona impresses with its bold design, high-tech features, and engaging driving dynamics, making it a standout choice for those seeking a fun and stylish ride. Meanwhile, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach, boasting a spacious interior and commendable fuel efficiency, which appeals to families and budget-conscious buyers alike. Ultimately, the choice between the Kona and S-Cross hinges on personal preferences: whether you prioritize sporty performance or practicality in your daily drives.
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Hyundai Kona and Suzuki S-Cross stand out for their unique characteristics, technical prowess, and innovative features. While both vehicles target the same category of consumers seeking a great mix of practicality, style, and performance, they each offer distinct advantages that cater to varying needs and preferences. In this comparison, we’ll explore the technical aspects, innovations, and overall appeal of the Hyundai Kona and Suzuki S-Cross.
Starting with price, the Hyundai Kona has a broader price range, with options between €26,400 and €44,990. This range includes various trims and powertrain options, allowing customers to find a wrap-up that suits their budget. In comparison, the Suzuki S-Cross is well-priced between €31,440 and €39,340, offering fewer configurations. This pricing strategy makes the Kona an attractive option for those seeking entry-level features, while the S-Cross appeals to buyers looking for solid features in a more limited range.
The Hyundai Kona provides a versatile lineup that includes petrol, full hybrid, and electric engine options. The petrol variants range from a modest 100 HP to a powerful 218 HP, allowing for impressive acceleration and top speeds reaching up to 208 km/h. With a fuel consumption rate starting at 5.7 L/100km, the Kona presents a compelling case for efficiency, especially in its hybrid and electric versions.
On the other hand, the Suzuki S-Cross features a narrower engine range, focusing primarily on full hybrid and petrol mild-hybrid options with power outputs ranging from 116 HP to 129 HP. The S-Cross delivers decent acceleration, reaching 0-100 km/h in approximately 9.5 seconds. While its maximum speed of up to 195 km/h is commendable, the Kona outshines in sheer power and variety.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the S-Cross edges out slightly with a consumption rate as low as 5.1 L/100km, particularly appealing to eco-conscious consumers. The Kona, while competitive at a consumption rate of 5.7 L/100km for its petrol versions, offers a more extensive line of electric and hybrid solutions, boasting an electric range of up to 514 km, thus appealing to those looking into fully electric options.
Both SUVs comfortably accommodate five passengers, but their trunk capacities differ, with the Kona offering an impressive 466 liters compared to the S-Cross’s 430 liters. The increased storage space in the Kona makes it a better option for families or those needing extra cargo capacity. Furthermore, both vehicles provide quality interior finishes, but the Kona’s modern design and layout edge out the S-Cross in terms of contemporary styling.
In terms of tech features, the Hyundai Kona shines brightly. It incorporates an intuitive infotainment system with robust smartphone integration, featuring Apple CarPlay and Android Auto as standard across most trims. Additionally, advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) enhance safety on the road, with features such as autonomous emergency braking and lane-keeping assistance.
The Suzuki S-Cross, while also delivering essential tech features, tends to focus more on practical rather than premium technology. Some models come equipped with a decent infotainment system and driver assistance technologies, but fall short compared to the Kona's extensive offerings.
Ultimately, the choice between the Hyundai Kona and Suzuki S-Cross boils down to individual needs and preferences. The Kona impresses with its engine variety, advanced technology, and spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for those seeking versatility and modernity in a small SUV. Conversely, the S-Cross provides a reliable, efficient, and competitively priced option with a straightforward, practical focus. Buyers would do well to consider what aspects—power, efficiency, tech, or capacity—are most important to them when making their decision.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 22600 - 41600
£
|
Price
about 21400 - 33700
£
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.7
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.8
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
377 - 514
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
128, 103, 141, 152, 0
g/km
|
co2
116 - 131
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1370 - 1773
kg
|
Curb weight
1280 - 1435
kg
|
Trunk capacity
466
L
|
Trunk capacity
430
L
|
Length
4350 - 4385
mm
|
Length
4300
mm
|
Width
1825
mm
|
Width
1785
mm
|
Height
1580 - 1585
mm
|
Height
1580
mm
|
Payload
420 - 490
kg
|
Payload
375 - 405
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automated Manual, Manual Gearbox, Schaltgetriebe
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
100 - 218
HP
|
Power HP
116 - 129
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 13.3
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.5
s
|
Max Speed
162 - 208
km/h
|
Max Speed
175 - 195
km/h
|
Torque
200 - 265
Nm
|
Torque
235
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
74 - 160
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 95
kW
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462
cm3
|
Top speed
162 - 208
km/h
|
Top speed
175 - 195
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.