@ Hyundai Motor Company
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
VS

Hyundai Kona vs Suzuki S-Cross – Which car suits you better?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Hyundai Kona or Suzuki S-Cross?

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Hyundai Kona and Suzuki S-Cross stand out for their unique characteristics, technical prowess, and innovative features. While both vehicles target the same category of consumers seeking a great mix of practicality, style, and performance, they each offer distinct advantages that cater to varying needs and preferences. In this comparison, we’ll explore the technical aspects, innovations, and overall appeal of the Hyundai Kona and Suzuki S-Cross.

S-Cross @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Pricing and Value for Money

Starting with price, the Hyundai Kona has a broader price range, with options between €26,400 and €44,990. This range includes various trims and powertrain options, allowing customers to find a wrap-up that suits their budget. In comparison, the Suzuki S-Cross is well-priced between €31,440 and €39,340, offering fewer configurations. This pricing strategy makes the Kona an attractive option for those seeking entry-level features, while the S-Cross appeals to buyers looking for solid features in a more limited range.

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Engine Options and Performance

The Hyundai Kona provides a versatile lineup that includes petrol, full hybrid, and electric engine options. The petrol variants range from a modest 100 HP to a powerful 218 HP, allowing for impressive acceleration and top speeds reaching up to 208 km/h. With a fuel consumption rate starting at 5.7 L/100km, the Kona presents a compelling case for efficiency, especially in its hybrid and electric versions.

On the other hand, the Suzuki S-Cross features a narrower engine range, focusing primarily on full hybrid and petrol mild-hybrid options with power outputs ranging from 116 HP to 129 HP. The S-Cross delivers decent acceleration, reaching 0-100 km/h in approximately 9.5 seconds. While its maximum speed of up to 195 km/h is commendable, the Kona outshines in sheer power and variety.

S-Cross @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

When it comes to fuel efficiency, the S-Cross edges out slightly with a consumption rate as low as 5.1 L/100km, particularly appealing to eco-conscious consumers. The Kona, while competitive at a consumption rate of 5.7 L/100km for its petrol versions, offers a more extensive line of electric and hybrid solutions, boasting an electric range of up to 514 km, thus appealing to those looking into fully electric options.

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Interior Space and Comfort

Both SUVs comfortably accommodate five passengers, but their trunk capacities differ, with the Kona offering an impressive 466 liters compared to the S-Cross’s 430 liters. The increased storage space in the Kona makes it a better option for families or those needing extra cargo capacity. Furthermore, both vehicles provide quality interior finishes, but the Kona’s modern design and layout edge out the S-Cross in terms of contemporary styling.

S-Cross @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Technological Innovations

In terms of tech features, the Hyundai Kona shines brightly. It incorporates an intuitive infotainment system with robust smartphone integration, featuring Apple CarPlay and Android Auto as standard across most trims. Additionally, advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) enhance safety on the road, with features such as autonomous emergency braking and lane-keeping assistance.

The Suzuki S-Cross, while also delivering essential tech features, tends to focus more on practical rather than premium technology. Some models come equipped with a decent infotainment system and driver assistance technologies, but fall short compared to the Kona's extensive offerings.

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Conclusion: Choosing the Right SUV

Ultimately, the choice between the Hyundai Kona and Suzuki S-Cross boils down to individual needs and preferences. The Kona impresses with its engine variety, advanced technology, and spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for those seeking versatility and modernity in a small SUV. Conversely, the S-Cross provides a reliable, efficient, and competitively priced option with a straightforward, practical focus. Buyers would do well to consider what aspects—power, efficiency, tech, or capacity—are most important to them when making their decision.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

S-Cross @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki S-Cross has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21800 £, while the Hyundai Kona costs 23100 £. That’s a price difference of around 1295 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Hyundai Kona manages with 4.60 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.30 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona has a clearly edge – offering 218 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 108 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the Hyundai Kona performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Suzuki S-Cross tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 25 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Hyundai Kona pulls somewhat stronger with 265 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is slight lighter – 1280 kg compared to 1370 kg. The difference is around 90 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers barely noticeable more room – 466 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 36 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Hyundai Kona performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1300 L, which is about 70 L more than the Suzuki S-Cross.

When it comes to payload, Hyundai Kona slightly takes the win – 490 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 85 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Hyundai Kona shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £23,100
Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 218 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.8 kWh
  • Electric Range : 377 - 514 km
details

Hyundai Kona

5 (1)
rate

The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg @ Hyundai Motor Company
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg @ Hyundai Motor Company
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg @ Hyundai Motor Company
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg @ Hyundai Motor Company

Suzuki S-Cross

4.5 (2)
rate

The Suzuki S-Cross is a neatly packaged crossover that puts everyday practicality ahead of showy theatrics, offering a comfortable cabin and predictable handling that suit family life and weekend errands alike. It’s not a headline-grabber, but its sensible packaging, low-key charm and reputation for reliability make it a shrewd choice for buyers who prefer smart value over flash.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki_S-Cross_004 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki_S-Cross_016 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki_S-Cross_037 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki_S-Cross_040 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki_S-Cross_049 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
S-CROSS_innen2 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

Miroljub 6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Top Car Comparisons

@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona serves up sharper handling, eye-catching design and punchier tech for drivers who want a bit of fun with their commute, while the Toyota Yaris Cross favours sensible virtues — class-leading hybrid economy, solid build and a more practical cabin for real-world family life. If you …
Hyundai Kona
Suzuki S-Cross
Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company
S-Cross @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
23100 - 41600 £
Price
21800 - 34200 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47 L
Fuel tank capacity
47 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
Curb weight
1280 - 1385 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
4350 - 4385 mm
Length
4305 mm
Width
1825 mm
Width
1785 mm
Height
1580 - 1585 mm
Height
1580 mm
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
Max trunk capacity
1230 L
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
162 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 185 km/h
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
1373 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Suzuki

Similar Comparisons

@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross is the scrappy, value-packed compact SUV — cheaper to buy, nimbler in town and surprisingly practical, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a little driving sparkle for Toyota’s famed refinement, stronger safety kit and an efficient hybrid powertrain. Pick the S‑Cross if you …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Bayon
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai Kona each offer distinct advantages tailored to different driver preferences. The Bayon impresses with its sleek urban design and efficient use of space, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the Kona stands …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai i20
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Hyundai i20 and Hyundai Kona cater to different driving experiences, yet both deliver exceptional value. The Hyundai i20 shines with its compact design and fuel efficiency, making it an ideal city car, while the Hyundai Kona offers a more robust and versatile ride, …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai i30 Wagon
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai i30 Wagon and Hyundai Kona compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona and Skoda Elroq stand out with their distinct design and performance capabilities. The Kona impresses with its dynamic styling and tech-forward interior, appealing to younger buyers, while the Elroq offers a spacious cabin and practical …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Captur
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Unsure whether the Renault Captur or the Suzuki S-Cross is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Explorer EV
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
In the battle of electric versatility, the Ford Explorer EV outshines with its spacious interior and impressive towing capacity, making it an ideal choice for families and adventurers alike. Conversely, the Hyundai Kona offers a nimble driving experience and a more compact design, perfect for urban …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Symbioz
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona stands out with its bold design and advanced technology features, offering drivers a dynamic and engaging driving experience. In contrast, the Renault Symbioz takes a more futuristic approach, emphasizing sustainability and autonomous driving …
Is the Hyundai Kona offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.