VS

Hyundai Kona vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Suzuki S-Cross?

Hyundai Kona vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences

Hyundai Kona

4.6 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • barely more trunk space
details

Suzuki S-Cross

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Achim Sedelmaier
Kona

Hyundai Kona VS Suzuki S-Cross: a compact-SUV comparison for real buyers

The Hyundai Kona VS Suzuki S-Cross match-up separates a tech- and comfort-focused small SUV from a pragmatic, value-oriented rival. The Kona presents itself as the more modern, well-equipped option with a calm, composed character that aims to make daily life easier. The S-Cross trades gloss for straightforward utility: robust kit levels, simple controls and an optional all-wheel-drive system for conditions where grip matters. Choosing between them is about whether you prioritise refinement and efficiency or low fuss practicality and traction. Below we look at how those differences play out in everyday use rather than on paper.

S-Cross

Character and driving: composed versus candid

The Hyundai Kona feels composed and grown-up, prioritising a settled ride and confident power when you ask for it, so drivers who value calm progress will appreciate its demeanour. The Suzuki S-Cross is the more candid partner: lighter steering, an eager mild-hybrid on the right spec that feels peppy around town, and a no-nonsense delivery that matches its pragmatic cabin. Where the Kona aims for insulation and polish, the S-Cross lays its engineering on the table — clever where useful, blunt where cost was saved. That means the Kona will feel smoother and more effortless on mixed routes, while the S-Cross rewards drivers who want straightforward responses and the option of extra traction. If you care about sporty feedback, neither is a hot hatch, but the Kona leans toward refinement and the S-Cross toward honesty.

Kona

Comfort and cabin feel: modern calm vs functional robustness

Step into the Hyundai Kona and the impression is immediately more modern: larger, clearer displays, thoughtful tactile controls and materials that generally feel a touch more contemporary. The Suzuki S-Cross relies on hard-wearing plastics and easy-to-use switches that will age well in the hands of a utility-first owner, but the cabin lacks the same visual refinement or quietness at speed. On longer trips the Kona’s quieter character and composed damping make fatigue less likely, whereas the S-Cross’s coarser acoustic insulation and simpler seats become more noticeable after hours on the motorway. Both are comfortable for daily use, but the Kona’s interior feels like an upgrade in perceived quality while the S-Cross trades that for robustness and simplicity. Buyers who prize a refined cabin will prefer the Kona; those who want durable, no-frills ergonomics will find the S-Cross more honest.

S-Cross

Practicality and family usability: room and cleverness vs straightforward cargo sense

In real-world family life the Hyundai Kona tends to win on usable space and luggage flexibility, with a larger boot and practical folding options that make loading a stroller or holiday kit less of a wrestling match. The Suzuki S-Cross answers with a smart, variable load floor and a well-shaped boot that works hard for daily shopping and weekend gear, plus the benefit that some hybrid layouts on the S-Cross keep packaging simple. The trade-off becomes obvious with hybrid variants: certain S-Cross hybrid systems intrude into luggage space, while the Kona’s layout generally preserves boot usability across the range. Rear-seat comfort mirrors that split — the Kona gives a bit more room and a more upscale feel, the S-Cross keeps things straightforward and accommodative for two adults. For families, the Kona leans toward convenience and versatility; the S-Cross toward pragmatic usability and easier maintenance.

Kona

City friendliness and long-distance behavior: nimble town car vs rugged commuter

Both cars are handy in the city, but the Kona’s lighter steering, tighter turning feel and more generous camera/park aids make short trips and tight spaces marginally less stressful. The S-Cross is equally manoeuvrable and brings the extra bonus of an optional ALLGRIP system that gives confidence in poor weather or unpaved lanes — a real advantage for buyers outside urban areas. On motorways the Kona’s refinement and quieter drivetrain generally make it the more comfortable long-distance companion, whereas the S-Cross can feel louder and less serene at high speed. If your life mixes urban errands with occasional country roads, the S-Cross’s traction and simple mechanical sympathy are strong arguments; if you spend more time on dual carriageways and want lower cabin noise, the Kona pulls ahead. The decision is therefore about the balance of daily ease versus occasional off-asphalt confidence.

S-Cross

Buyer fit: who should test drive which first before the technical deep dive

If you prioritise modern kit, interior calm and efficient running in everyday use, start your test drive with the Hyundai Kona — it suits tech-oriented small families and commuters who value refinement. If your checklist emphasises straightforward controls, equipment for the money and the reassurance of optional all-wheel traction, the Suzuki S-Cross should be at the top of your list. Those on a stricter budget or who frequently face slippery roads will appreciate what the S-Cross offers without the frills, while buyers who want quieter motorway miles and more cabin polish will prefer the Kona. With those buyer fits in mind, the next step is a technical comparison to see how engines, packaging and options map to your specific priorities.

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Hyundai Kona
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Toyota Yaris Cross are two leading subcompact crossover SUVs that suit buyers wanting compact size, efficient powertrains and easy city driving. This comparison looks at how the Kona and Yaris Cross differ in driving feel, interior space, practicality and ownership costs so you …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kona

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki S-Cross is barely cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Hyundai Kona costs 23,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,809 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

S-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers substantially more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 94 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai Kona delivers slightly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

Kona

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is marginally lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 90 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers barely more boot space – 466 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 36 L.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries somewhat more – 490 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 85 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,600
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 380 - 510 km
details
Hyundai Kona
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg

Reviews Hyundai Kona

4.6 (10 Reviews)
rate
Wendy
18 Jun 2026, 20:05:08

More space in the Kona, and I find the Opel confusing with an oddly high step-in.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
OLGA
12 Jun 2026, 00:41:55

I feel very safe driving the Kona. I’ve been driving since I was 24 and I’m 76. I’ve had many brands — BMW X3, BMW X5, Ford, Peugeot, Renault — all very good brands, but the Kona seduced me and I don’t want to change; it’s just that the 2026 version isn’t coming into Argentina.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul Corkish
8 Jun 2026, 11:47:29

About to buy my new 3rd Kona (2nd N line Hybrid)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Austin
21 May 2026, 19:30:33

Better fit for is 6'3" people

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
TOTO
20 May 2026, 11:23:42

The Kona is an SUV that delivers, especially in terms of driving comfort. It's noticeably easier to get into and settle into as you get older. Less feisty than the MG4 but slightly more economical.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
Peter
24 Aug 2026, 23:05:21

Value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different visions of mobility: the Kona is a compact, practical crossover you can buy today, while the Symbioz is Renault’s futuristic concept car showcasing autonomous, connected electric technologies. If you want an affordable, …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV practicality in a city-friendly package. The S-Cross leans toward space and straightforward value, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency, urban agility and advanced safety tech—so pick …
Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai Kona are closely related compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a small SUV, but they take different approaches to size, style and capability. This comparison will help you decide whether the Bayon’s city-focused practicality and value or the Kona’s wider engine …
Hyundai Kona
Kia EV3
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV3 comes down to whether you prefer a well-established compact crossover with a proven track record or a newer electric contender focused on efficiency and modern tech. I’ll walk you through how they compare across range, practicality, driving feel and …
Dacia Duster
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Duster and the Suzuki S-Cross is about whether you want rugged simplicity and great value or a more refined, comfortable compact crossover. This comparison will focus on real-world space, economy, driving feel and running costs to help you decide which suits your needs.
Hyundai Kona
Kia Stonic
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Stonic are two popular compact crossovers that blend city-friendly size with SUV styling and efficient engines. This comparison focuses on the practical differences—space, driving feel, equipment and running costs—so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Hyundai Kona
Kia Sportage
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Sportage go head-to-head in the compact-SUV ring — the Kona is cheeky, city-savvy and punchy, while the Sportage leans into grown-up comfort and family-friendly practicality. We’ll break down which one gives you sharper driving thrills, better everyday usability and the …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Hyundai Kona
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,600 - 41,900 £
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,825 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Suzuki
Is the Hyundai Kona offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.