VS

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison

Compare performance (326 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (31,500 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW 2 Series Active Tourer or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

4.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • noticeably more efficient
  • moderately more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
details

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

2 Series Active Tourer

Meet the Contenders: BMW 2er Active Tourer vs. Range Rover Evoque

As the automotive world increasingly focuses on compact and efficient designs, two models stand out in the multi-purpose vehicle and SUV segments: the BMW 2er Active Tourer and the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Both offer unique blends of style, technology, and performance. Let's delve into the specifics and see how these two popular vehicles stack up against each other.

Range Rover Evoque

Design and Dimensions

The BMW 2er Active Tourer, with its MPV body type, exudes a sleek yet practical design. It measures 4,386 mm in length, 1,824 mm in width, and stands 1,576 mm tall. The compact dimensions enable excellent maneuverability making it an ideal choice for urban environments.

In contrast, the Range Rover Evoque sports an SUV body, synonymous with robust and dynamic aesthetics. At 4,371 mm long, 1,900 mm wide, and a height of 1,649 mm, the Evoque offers a more robust stance, appealing to those who prioritize presence and versatility.

2 Series Active Tourer

Performance and Efficiency

Under the hood, the BMW 2er Active Tourer offers a selection of engines ranging from the frugal 122 HP to a punchy 326 HP in its plug-in hybrid variant, with a remarkable electric range of up to 88 km. Its dual-clutch automatic transmission and front-wheel or all-wheel drive options provide sharp handling and versatility.

The Range Rover Evoque, known for its off-road capabilities, doesn’t fall short with its all-wheel drive and engine options producing up to 269 HP. The plug-in hybrid version supports an electric range of 68 km, demonstrating Land Rover's commitment to sustainability without sacrificing capability.

Range Rover Evoque

Technological Innovations

Both the 2er Active Tourer and Evoque embrace cutting-edge technology. The BMW houses a host of smart technologies, including adaptive headlights, a digital cockpit, and advanced driver-assistance systems, ensuring a seamless driving experience.

The Evoque, on the other hand, boasts Land Rover’s latest Pivi Pro infotainment system, featuring intuitive connectivity options and high-resolution displays. Its Terrain Response system further elevates its off-road credentials, adapting the vehicle's setup to suit various driving conditions.

2 Series Active Tourer

Space and Practicality

With seating for five, both models cater well to small families. The BMW offers a trunk capacity of up to 470 liters, maximizing cabin space for day-to-day conveniences. Meanwhile, the Evoque offers a slightly larger trunk with a capacity of 472 liters, enhancing its appeal for those longer journeys or more adventurous family outings.

Range Rover Evoque

Conclusion

Choosing between the BMW 2er Active Tourer and the Range Rover Evoque comes down to lifestyle preferences. If urban mobility with innovative tech is your focus, the 2er Active Tourer is an excellent choice. Alternatively, if off-road capability with a fashionable edge is your priority, the Evoque is a compelling proposition. Both models bring a lot to the table, and either would make a commendable addition to a modern car enthusiast's garage.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

2 Series Active Tourer

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer is clearly cheaper – starting at 31,500 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,785 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer uses 2.9 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer offers moderately more range – reaching up to 82 km, about 15 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

Range Rover Evoque

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer offers a bit more power – delivering 326 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 57 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.5 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.2 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers moderately more torque with 540 Nm compared to 477 Nm. That’s about 63 Nm more.

2 Series Active Tourer

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, BMW 2 Series Active Tourer is moderately lighter – 1,545 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 247 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers very slightly more boot space – 472 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 2 L.

When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries moderately more – 600 kg compared to 505 kg. That’s a difference of about 95 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW 2 Series Active Tourer holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £31,500
2 Series Active Tourer

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 122 - 326 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.9 - 6.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 82 km
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

The BMW 2 Series Active Tourer turns the family MPV into something you’d actually want to park outside a café, pairing compact practicality with surprisingly premium cabin flair. It won’t thrill like a sports car, but it drives with the composed poise you expect from the badge and keeps daily life easy and un-fussy.

details

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.

details
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption

Price
31,500 - 48,500 £
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
Consumption L/100km
2.9 - 6.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
82 km
Electric Range
60 - 67 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
65 - 140 g/km
co2
85 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
MPV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,545 - 1,920 kg
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
Trunk capacity
406 - 470 L
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,824 mm
Width
1,900 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
465 - 505 kg
Payload
503 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 - 326 HP
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
90 - 240 kW
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
Brand
BMW
Brand
Land Rover
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.