Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
BMW 3 Series Touring vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison
Compare performance (530 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW 3 Series Touring or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
BMW 3 Series Touring vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences
3 Series Touring
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
BMW 3 Series Touring is very slightly cheaper – starting at 41,100 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,228 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW 3 Series Touring uses 2.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the BMW 3 Series Touring offers clearly more range – reaching up to 97 km, about 30 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW 3 Series Touring offers substantially more power – delivering 530 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 261 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 3 Series Touring is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.2 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW 3 Series Touring delivers visibly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.
3 Series Touring
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BMW 3 Series Touring is very slightly lighter – 1,650 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 142 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BMW 3 Series Touring offers barely more boot space – 500 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries a bit more – 600 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 80 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The BMW 3 Series Touring is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £41,100
BMW 3 Series Touring
BMW 3 Series Touring
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
BMW 3 Series Touring
The BMW 3 Series Touring blends sporting poise with everyday practicality, wrapping sharp handling and a premium cabin into a wagon that actually makes errands feel enjoyable. It’s the kind of car that hides a family-hauler’s sense of duty beneath a driver's-car attitude — useful, classy, and just cheeky enough to make you smile on the open road.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
BMW 3 Series Touring
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41,100 - 91,900 £
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 10.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
91 - 97 km
|
Electric Range
60 - 67 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
57 - 233 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,650 - 2,025 kg
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
410 - 500 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,827 - 1,903 mm
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
430 - 520 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 530 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 8.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 700 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 390 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.