VS

Audi Q3 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?

Audi Q3 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences

Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • substantially more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Audi Q3 is a bit cheaper – starting at 38,200 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,057 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q3 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 119 km, about 52 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

Range Rover Evoque

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers only slightly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 3 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.2 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers clearly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 140 Nm more.

Q3

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q3 is marginally lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 157 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q3 offers only slightly more boot space – 488 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 16 L.

When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries a bit more – 600 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,200
Q3

Audi Q3

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 118 - 119 km
Audi Q3
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 is a compact premium crossover that blends sharp styling with a well-crafted interior, making it an appealing choice for urban drivers who want a touch of luxury. It delivers a composed ride, intuitive tech features and a practical cabin, so it works well as a comfortable daily driver with an upscale feel.

details

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.

details
Audi Q3
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption

Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Electric Range
60 - 67 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
39 - 195 g/km
co2
85 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,900 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
503 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
Brand
Audi
Brand
Land Rover
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.