Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi Q3 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque – Differences & prices compared
Q3
@ Audi AG
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Audi Q3 has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38200 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43300 £. That’s a price difference of around 5057 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi Q3 manages with 1.70 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.70 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Audi Q3 performs significantly better – achieving up to 119 km, about 59 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 has a slight edge – offering 272 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 3 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 5.70 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.20 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Audi Q3 performs somewhat better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque tops out at 213 km/h. The difference is around 27 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque pulls evident stronger with 540 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 140 Nm difference.
Q3
@ Audi AG
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Audi Q3 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1635 kg compared to 1792 kg. The difference is around 157 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Audi Q3 offers minimal more room – 488 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 16 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Audi Q3 performs a bit better – up to 1386 L, which is about 230 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque to a small extent takes the win – 600 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Audi Q3 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Audi Q3 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
Audi Q3
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £38,200
@ Audi AG
Audi Q3
Audi Q3
5 (1 Reviews)
The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.
details
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
1 (1 Reviews)
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Audi Q3
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
|
@ Audi AG
|
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38200 - 52900 £
|
Price
43300 - 64800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
|
|
co2
39 - 195 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 60 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1635 - 1900 kg
|
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4531 mm
|
Length
4371 mm
|
|
Width
1859 mm
|
Width
1900 mm
|
|
Height
1559 - 1601 mm
|
Height
1649 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1196 - 1386 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
|
|
Payload
505 - 535 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
208 - 240 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Is the Audi Q3 offered with different drivetrains?
The Audi Q3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.