In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 stands out with its refined interior and advanced technology features, offering a luxurious driving experience. In contrast, the SEAT Ateca impresses with its sporty design and excellent value, making it a practical choice for those seeking both style and functionality. While the Q3 provides premium amenities, the Ateca appeals to budget-conscious buyers without compromising on performance or comfort.
The automotive landscape is rich with options, but few comparisons are as intriguing as that of the Audi Q3 and the SEAT Ateca. While both models belong to the ever-popular SUV category, they deliver distinct driving experiences and cater to different market segments. In this article, we’ll explore their various technical aspects and innovations to understand which SUV might be the right choice for you.
Starting with dimensions, the Audi Q3 measures 4484 mm in length, 1849 mm in width, and stands 1585 mm high. It boasts a sleek and sophisticated appearance that reflects Audi's premium brand identity. On the other hand, the SEAT Ateca is slightly shorter at 4381 mm, narrower at 1841 mm, but taller at 1601 mm. Its sporty design makes it an attractive option for buyers seeking a more youthful look.
Under the hood, the Audi Q3 offers a variety of powertrains, including petrol and diesel engines that range from 150 to 245 HP. This translates to impressive performance, with the Q3 achieving 0-100 km/h in as little as 5.8 seconds with its most powerful engine. Additionally, Audi's all-wheel-drive option enhances traction and stability, making it suitable for various driving conditions.
Conversely, the SEAT Ateca offers fewer engine choices, with outputs between 116 to 150 HP. Its best acceleration time is 9 seconds for the more powerful variants, which, while respectable, does not quite match the Q3's ferocity. The Ateca is equipped mainly with a front-wheel-drive system, striking a balance between performance and fuel efficiency.
When it comes to fuel consumption, the Audi Q3 generally consumes between 5.5 to 8.5 L/100 km based on the chosen engine and configuration. Its CO2 emissions range from 143 to 193 g/km, placing it on various efficiency classes from E to G. The Ateca, however, excels in this department, with values ranging from 4.9 to 6.4 L/100 km and emissions of 129 to 144 g/km, achieving efficiency ratings from D to E. This can significantly influence running costs, especially for environmentally-conscious consumers.
Both the Audi Q3 and the SEAT Ateca comfortably seat five passengers, yet they offer different experiences in terms of interior quality. The Q3 is known for its upscale materials, advanced technology, and spaciousness, boasting a trunk capacity of 530 liters. This makes it a great choice for families or those requiring extra storage.
The Ateca, while offering a slightly smaller trunk capacity of 510 liters, provides a functional and user-friendly interior. It features smart storage solutions and an intuitive infotainment system. This approach caters well to entry-level buyers who prioritize value and practicality.
In terms of technology, the Audi Q3 provides a high-tech experience with a virtual cockpit, advanced driver assistance systems, and an MMI infotainment system that is recognized for its user-friendly interface. Notably, the Q3 offers various driving modes, allowing drivers to tailor their experience from comfort to sport settings.
Meanwhile, the SEAT Ateca is fitted with its own impressive array of tech features, including a digital cockpit, advanced safety systems, and an easy-to-use infotainment system. Although it may not match Audi’s sophistication, it still offers good value with a well-rounded tech package.
Ultimately, the choice between the Audi Q3 and the SEAT Ateca comes down to personal preferences and specific needs. The Q3 appeals to those seeking luxury, performance, and advanced technology, while the Ateca stands out as a more budget-friendly alternative that does not compromise on essential features. Each SUV has its merits, making them both noteworthy contenders in the competitive SUV market. Whether you prioritize premium features or efficiency, both vehicles deliver satisfying driving experiences that cater to various lifestyles.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 32800 - 45200
£
|
Price
about 25100 - 37900
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 8.5
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 6.4
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
143 - 193
g/km
|
co2
129 - 144
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 - 60
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1525 - 1735
kg
|
Curb weight
1345 - 1514
kg
|
Trunk capacity
530
L
|
Trunk capacity
510
L
|
Length
4484 - 4500
mm
|
Length
4381
mm
|
Width
1843 - 1849
mm
|
Width
1841
mm
|
Height
1567 - 1585
mm
|
Height
1601
mm
|
Payload
455 - 495
kg
|
Payload
516 - 525
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Schaltgetriebe, Automat. Schaltgetriebe (Doppelkupplung)
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
150 - 245
HP
|
Power HP
116 - 150
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 9.5
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 11
s
|
Max Speed
200 - 237
km/h
|
Max Speed
183 - 202
km/h
|
Torque
250 - 400
Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
110 - 180
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 110
kW
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1968
cm3
|
Top speed
200 - 237
km/h
|
Top speed
183 - 202
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
SEAT
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.