When comparing the Kia Sportage and the SEAT Ateca, both models stand out for their blend of style and practicality. The Sportage boasts a more spacious interior and a comprehensive suite of tech features, appealing to families and tech enthusiasts alike. Meanwhile, the Ateca offers agile handling and a sporty design, making it a great choice for those who prioritize driving dynamics and aesthetics.
The automotive landscape is rich with choices, especially in the SUV segment where versatility and comfort reign supreme. Two contenders that command attention are the Kia Sportage and the SEAT Ateca. Both models present an enticing blend of style, technology, and performance, but how do they stack up against each other? In this article, we dissect their technical aspects, innovations, and overall driving experience.
Starting with dimensions, the Kia Sportage is moderately larger than the SEAT Ateca. The Sportage measures 4515 mm in length, 1865 mm in width, and 1650 mm in height, offering a spacious interior. In contrast, the Ateca is slightly smaller at 4381 mm in length, 1841 mm in width, and 1601 mm in height. Both vehicles comfortably seat five passengers, making them ideal for families.
The Kia Sportage boasts a diverse range of engine options, including Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Petrol, and Plugin Hybrid versions, with power outputs ranging from 136 HP to an impressive 252 HP. In contrast, the SEAT Ateca offers a more straightforward array of engine choices, with both petrol and diesel variants, delivering between 116 HP and 150 HP.
Acceleration figures also tell an interesting story. The Sportage shines with its top-performing hybrid variant capable of reaching 100 km/h in just 8.3 seconds, whereas the Ateca's quickest variant can achieve similar speeds in 9 seconds. The Sportage's superior engine options and acceleration figures position it as the more performance-oriented choice.
Both models feature manual and automatic transmission options. The Kia Sportage is available with a range of transmissions, including a dual-clutch automatic gearbox, while the SEAT Ateca offers manual and conventional automatic options. The Sportage's commitment to all-wheel drive enhances its driving capabilities, especially in challenging conditions, unlike the Ateca, which only offers front-wheel drive.
In terms of fuel consumption, the Kia Sportage has various powertrains with efficiency rated as low as 5 L/100 km, which is particularly impressive for its hybrid variants. On the other hand, the SEAT Ateca has competitive figures, with its best petrol engine consuming around 4.9 L/100 km. Thus, while both SUVs are fuel-efficient, the Sportage takes the edge in hybrid options.
The talent for interior design and technology is where both vehicles excel. The Kia Sportage features an advanced infotainment system with a user-friendly interface, connectivity options, and a substantial touch screen display. It also includes driver assistance features such as adaptive cruise control and lane assistance.
The SEAT Ateca, while slightly more conservative in its technology, does not lag behind. It includes a modern infotainment system, digital cockpit, and driver assistance features that ensure a safe and enjoyable driving experience.
When it comes to practicality, space matters, and the Kia Sportage shines with a trunk capacity ranging from 526 to 587 liters, depending on the variant. Meanwhile, the SEAT Ateca offers a respectable 510 liters. The Sportage's greater capacity means more flexibility for families and travelers alike.
In conclusion, choosing between the Kia Sportage and the SEAT Ateca is a challenge as both SUVs cater to different preferences and needs. The Kia Sportage stands out for its broad range of engine options, superior performance figures, and greater practicality, making it an excellent choice for those prioritizing versatility and cutting-edge technology. On the other hand, the SEAT Ateca provides a stylish and efficient package with solid performance, suited for drivers looking for a well-rounded SUV. Ultimately, the decision will depend on individual priorities, from performance to daily practicality.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 29700 - 44700
£
|
Price
about 25100 - 37900
£
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.2
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 6.4
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
64
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
28 - 162
g/km
|
co2
129 - 144
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1905
kg
|
Curb weight
1345 - 1514
kg
|
Trunk capacity
526 - 587
L
|
Trunk capacity
510
L
|
Length
4515
mm
|
Length
4381
mm
|
Width
1865
mm
|
Width
1841
mm
|
Height
1650
mm
|
Height
1601
mm
|
Payload
510 - 565
kg
|
Payload
516 - 525
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Automatikgetriebe
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Schaltgetriebe, Automat. Schaltgetriebe (Doppelkupplung)
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
136 - 252
HP
|
Power HP
116 - 150
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.6
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 11
s
|
Max Speed
180 - 194
km/h
|
Max Speed
183 - 202
km/h
|
Torque
265 - 350
Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
100 - 185
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 110
kW
|
Engine capacity
1598
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1968
cm3
|
Top speed
180 - 194
km/h
|
Top speed
183 - 202
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
SEAT
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.