Compare performance (243 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 25,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or SEAT Ateca?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the battle between the 2024 Ford Kuga and the SEAT Ateca stands out as a captivating showdown. Both models bring distinctive qualities, innovative features, and advanced technology. Here, we delve into their technical specifications and innovations to help potential buyers make an informed decision.
The Ford Kuga offers a diverse range of engine options, including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid variants. With power outputs ranging from 150 HP to a robust 243 HP, the Kuga caters to various performance preferences. The most potent version can achieve 0-100 km/h in an impressive 7.3 seconds and has a top speed of 200 km/h.
In contrast, the SEAT Ateca provides petrol and diesel engine choices, producing power from 116 HP to 150 HP. The Ateca achieves 0-100 km/h in 9 seconds, with a top speed reaching up to 202 km/h. While it might lack the hybrid options of the Kuga, its engine lineup efficiently balances performance and economy.
Ford Kuga offers a choice between a manual and a continuously variable transmission (CVT), paired with either front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive configurations. This versatility allows the Kuga to adapt to varied driving needs, from urban journeys to off-road adventures.
SEAT Ateca is equipped with either a manual or a dual-clutch automatic gearbox, strictly available in a front-wheel drive variant. While this limits its off-road abilities compared to the Kuga, it maintains a focus on smooth and efficient city driving.
Eco-friendly drivers will appreciate the Ford Kuga plug-in hybrid version, which boasts a remarkably low fuel consumption of just 0.9 L/100km, aided by an electric range of 69 km. This variant ensures minimal CO2 emissions of 20 g/km, positioning it in the 'B' CO2 efficiency class.
Meanwhile, the SEAT Ateca, with fuel consumption ranging between 4.9 and 6.4 L/100km, offers a practical balance between efficiency and performance, although it doesn’t match the Kuga's hybrid capabilities. Its CO2 efficiency falls within the 'D' class.
The SEAT Ateca leads in trunk capacity with a generous 510 liters, overshadowing the Ford Kuga's 412 liters. Both models accommodate five passengers comfortably, thanks to their spacious interiors and thoughtful design.
Dimensionally, the Ford Kuga is slightly larger, offering lengths from 4604 to 4645 mm, while the SEAT Ateca is more compact at 4381 mm in length, aiding maneuverability in tight city spaces.
Both SUVs are equipped with the latest driving aids, infotainment systems, and connectivity options. Ford’s advanced technologies, including hybrid powertrains and customizable drive modes, set a benchmark in innovation.
The SEAT Ateca integrates modern conveniences with an emphasis on user-friendly interfaces and dynamic driving aids, although it does lack the hybrid innovation seen in the Kuga.
The decision between the 2024 Ford Kuga and the SEAT Ateca ultimately depends on individual preferences. The Kuga, with its wide range of engine choices including hybrid options, suits those seeking efficiency and versatility. The Ateca, with its emphasis on practicality and compactness, appeals to urban drivers prioritizing space and simplicity.
Both models offer excellent value, making them worthy contenders in the compact SUV market. Whether you favor cutting-edge hybrid technology or streamlined city driving, there's a compelling choice to be made.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
SEAT Ateca is markedly cheaper – starting at 25,100 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,137 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the SEAT Ateca with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers noticeably more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 93 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the SEAT Ateca takes 9 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the SEAT Ateca delivers clearly more torque with 360 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, SEAT Ateca is a bit lighter – 1,345 kg compared to 1,526 kg. The difference is around 181 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries very slightly more – 550 kg compared to 525 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.
The Ford Kuga stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
details
The SEAT Ateca blends sharp, purposeful styling with practical space that turns everyday errands into something a bit more enjoyable. It’s poised and engaging to drive for its segment, offers solid value, and has just enough personality to make you smile on the school run.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
|
Price
25,100 - 36,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 6.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
129 - 144 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
|
Curb weight
1,345 - 1,514 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
510 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,882 mm
|
Width
1,841 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
516 - 525 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
SEAT
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España