VS

BMW 3 Series Touring vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (530 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW 3 Series Touring or Mazda CX-5?

BMW 3 Series Touring vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

BMW 3 Series Touring

4.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Series Touring

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-5 is markedly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the BMW 3 Series Touring costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,066 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW 3 Series Touring uses 2.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 4.5 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW 3 Series Touring offers significantly more power – delivering 530 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 389 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 3 Series Touring is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 6.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW 3 Series Touring delivers significantly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 462 Nm more.

3 Series Touring

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is marginally lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,650 kg. The difference is around 21 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW 3 Series Touring offers marginally more boot space – 500 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 34 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries moderately more – 601 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW 3 Series Touring is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,100
3 Series Touring

BMW 3 Series Touring

  • Engine Type : Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 530 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.5 - 10.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 91 - 97 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
BMW 3 Series Touring
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW 3 Series Touring

The BMW 3 Series Touring blends sporting poise with everyday practicality, wrapping sharp handling and a premium cabin into a wagon that actually makes errands feel enjoyable. It’s the kind of car that hides a family-hauler’s sense of duty beneath a driver's-car attitude — useful, classy, and just cheeky enough to make you smile on the open road.

details
P90479537_highRes_the-new-bmw-3-series
P90479535_highRes_the-new-bmw-3-series
P90479527_highRes_the-new-bmw-3-series
P90479519_highRes_the-new-bmw-3-series
P90479506_highRes_the-new-bmw-3-series

Reviews BMW 3 Series Touring

4.3 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
BMW 3 Series Touring
BMW X1
VS
Deciding between the BMW 3 Series Touring and the BMW X1 means weighing estate-car driving dynamics and cargo capacity against compact-SUV practicality and a higher seating position. The 3 Series Touring delivers sharper handling and a roomier load area, while the X1 offers greater ride height, …
BMW 3 Series Touring
BMW 5 Series Touring
VS
Choosing between the BMW 3 Series Touring and the BMW 5 Series Touring comes down to whether you prioritise agility, lower running costs and city-friendly size or extra space, rear-seat comfort and long-distance refinement. Both deliver BMW’s trademark driving dynamics and build quality, but the 3 …
Audi A5 Avant
BMW 3 Series Touring
VS
Choosing between the Audi A5 Avant and the BMW 3 Series Touring means deciding whether you prioritise elegant styling and a refined cabin or sharper handling and a more driver-focused feel. This comparison will run through practicality, performance, comfort and tech to help you pick the estate that …
BMW 3 Series Touring
Volvo V60
VS
In the competitive realm of premium wagons, the BMW 3 Series Touring and Volvo V60 both stand out for their distinctive blend of performance and practicality. The 3 Series Touring boasts BMW's dynamic handling and sporty aesthetics, appealing to those who crave an engaging driving experience. …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq comes down to whether you value driving finesse and cabin refinement or space and practicality. The CX-5 shines with engaging handling and an upscale interior, while the Kodiaq offers more passenger room, flexible seating and strong …
BMW 3 Series Touring
Skoda Octavia Combi
VS
The BMW 3 Series Touring and the Skoda Octavia Estate are both practical estate cars, but they target very different buyers: the 3 Series Touring delivers sharper handling, a premium interior and stronger brand cachet, while the Octavia Estate prioritises interior space, low running costs and sheer …
BMW 3 Series Touring
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
41,100 - 91,900 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 10.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
91 - 97 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
57 - 233 g/km
co2
157 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,650 - 2,025 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
410 - 500 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,827 - 1,903 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
430 - 520 kg
Payload
566 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 530 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 8.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 700 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 390 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
BMW
Brand
Mazda
Is the BMW 3 Series Touring offered with different drivetrains?

The BMW 3 Series Touring is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.