Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BMW 3 Series Touring vs Mazda CX-60 comparison
Compare performance (530 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW 3 Series Touring or Mazda CX-60?
BMW 3 Series Touring vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
3 Series Touring
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
BMW 3 Series Touring is marginally cheaper – starting at 41,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,614 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW 3 Series Touring uses 2.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the BMW 3 Series Touring offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 97 km, about 34 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
CX-60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW 3 Series Touring offers clearly more power – delivering 530 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 203 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 3 Series Touring is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW 3 Series Touring delivers noticeably more torque with 700 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
3 Series Touring
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BMW 3 Series Touring is moderately lighter – 1,650 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 240 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers somewhat more boot space – 570 L compared to 500 L. That’s a difference of about 70 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries slightly more – 612 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 92 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The BMW 3 Series Touring holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £41,100
BMW 3 Series Touring
BMW 3 Series Touring
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
BMW 3 Series Touring
The BMW 3 Series Touring blends sporting poise with everyday practicality, wrapping sharp handling and a premium cabin into a wagon that actually makes errands feel enjoyable. It’s the kind of car that hides a family-hauler’s sense of duty beneath a driver's-car attitude — useful, classy, and just cheeky enough to make you smile on the open road.
details
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
BMW 3 Series Touring
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41,100 - 91,900 £
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 10.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
91 - 97 km
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.5 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
57 - 233 g/km
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,650 - 2,025 kg
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
410 - 500 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
4,713 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,827 - 1,903 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
1,448 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,420 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
430 - 520 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 530 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 8.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
225 - 230 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 700 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
110 - 390 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.