Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
BMW 3 Series Touring vs Skoda Superb Combi comparison
Compare performance (530 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 36,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW 3 Series Touring or Skoda Superb Combi?
BMW 3 Series Touring vs Skoda Superb Combi: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
3 Series Touring
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Superb Combi is slightly cheaper – starting at 36,100 £ , while the BMW 3 Series Touring costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,972 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Superb Combi uses 1.2 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the BMW 3 Series Touring with 2.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Superb Combi offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 137 km, about 40 km more than the BMW 3 Series Touring.
Superb Combi
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW 3 Series Touring offers clearly more power – delivering 530 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 265 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 3 Series Touring is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Skoda Superb Combi takes 5.7 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW 3 Series Touring delivers substantially more torque with 700 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.
3 Series Touring
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Superb Combi is barely lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 1,650 kg. The difference is around 75 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Superb Combi offers clearly more boot space – 690 L compared to 500 L. That’s a difference of about 190 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Superb Combi carries moderately more – 584 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 64 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Superb Combi holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,100
Skoda Superb Combi
BMW 3 Series Touring
Skoda Superb Combi
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
BMW 3 Series Touring
The BMW 3 Series Touring blends sporting poise with everyday practicality, wrapping sharp handling and a premium cabin into a wagon that actually makes errands feel enjoyable. It’s the kind of car that hides a family-hauler’s sense of duty beneath a driver's-car attitude — useful, classy, and just cheeky enough to make you smile on the open road.
details
Skoda Superb Combi
The Skoda Superb Combi is the practical hero of the estate world, offering cavernous space and a calm, refined ride that makes family life feel effortless. Its clever features, understated design and no-nonsense value make it a smart pick for buyers who want Germanic engineering without the badge premium — and it even manages to stay surprisingly stylish while doing all the heavy lifting.
details
BMW 3 Series Touring
Skoda Superb Combi
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41,100 - 93,300 £
|
Price
36,100 - 52,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 10.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
91 - 97 km
|
Electric Range
128 - 137 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
57 - 233 g/km
|
co2
28 - 178 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,650 - 2,025 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,853 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
410 - 500 L
|
Trunk capacity
510 - 690 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,827 - 1,903 mm
|
Width
1,849 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
430 - 520 kg
|
Payload
497 - 584 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 530 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 8.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 700 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 390 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, G, B
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.