Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España
X3
@ BMW Group Press
VS
BMW X3 vs Mercedes C-Class Wagon – Differences & prices compared
Two cars, one duel: BMW X3 meets Mercedes C-Class Wagon.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
C-Class Wagon
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
The Battle of Luxury: BMW X3 vs. Mercedes C-Klasse T-Modell
The automotive market has long been a battleground for luxury vehicles, and two models that stand out in this segment are the BMW X3 and the Mercedes C-Klasse T-Modell. The X3, a premium SUV, and the C-Klasse T-Modell, a versatile wagon, offer their own unique blend of luxury, performance, and cutting-edge technology. In this comparison, we will explore their technical aspects and innovations to determine which one comes out on top.
X3
@ BMW Group Press
Powertrains and Performance
The BMW X3 offers a wide array of powertrains, including options such as Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, and traditional petrol engines. It boasts performance figures ranging from 190 hp to an impressive 510 hp for the X3 M. The acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h can be achieved in as little as 3.8 seconds, making it a formidable contender in the performance domain.
In contrast, the Mercedes C-Klasse T-Modell comes with a selection of petrol and diesel MHEV engines, pushing power output from 193 hp to a remarkable 680 hp in the AMG variant. The acceleration efficiency is equally impressive, with the top-of-the-line models hitting 100 km/h in just 3.4 seconds.
C-Class Wagon
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Fuel Efficiency and Eco-Friendliness
Fuel efficiency is a crucial consideration for modern buyers, and both cars offer competitive options. The BMW X3 has a consumption range between 0.9 to 10.8 L/100km, while providing a max electric range of up to 90 km for its Plug-in Hybrid variant. On the other hand, the C-Klasse T-Modell showcases impressive fuel efficiency, with consumption figures ranging from 0.4 to 9 L/100km and an electric range of up to 113 km.
X3
@ BMW Group Press
Interior and Technology
Step inside the BMW X3, and you're greeted with a blend of luxury and advanced technology. The interior boasts spacious seating for five, alongside high-quality materials and cutting-edge infotainment options. Innovations such as the BMW iDrive system offer intuitive controls, smartphone integration, and a host of driver assistance features that cater to a luxurious driving experience.
On the other hand, the Mercedes C-Klasse T-Modell takes a different approach to interior design. Its cabin is ergonomically designed with premium materials, focusing on comfort and style. The Mercedes MBUX infotainment system stands out with its voice-activated controls and seamless connectivity, providing an intelligent driving environment. Furthermore, it integrates the latest in digital instrumentation, offering a futuristic dashboard display.
C-Class Wagon
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Space and Practicality
While the BMW X3 excels in utility due to its SUV build, offering trunk capacities between 550 to 570 liters, the C-Klasse T-Modell provides adequate storage for a wagon, with trunk spaces ranging up to 490 liters. Both models prioritize passenger comfort, but the X3's spaciousness is more pronounced, making it the preferred choice for families or those needing more cargo room.
X3
@ BMW Group Press
Safety Features
When it comes to safety, both vehicles are equipped with the latest technology to ensure driver and passenger security. The BMW X3 includes advanced driver assistance systems that enhance stability and accident avoidance. Likewise, the C-Klasse T-Modell features high-level safety technologies that have earned it high ratings in crash tests, making it a reliable choice for safety-conscious buyers.
C-Class Wagon
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Conclusion: Which One Reigns Supreme?
In conclusion, choosing between the BMW X3 and the Mercedes C-Klasse T-Modell ultimately depends on personal preference and needs. If you prioritize spaciousness, ruggedness, and performance versatility, the BMW X3 is the clear winner. Conversely, if you value style, advanced tech features, and a luxurious driving experience in a refined wagon design, the C-Klasse T-Modell stands out.
Both vehicles represent the pinnacle of automotive engineering, but your final choice should reflect your lifestyle and driving aspirations. With their blend of power, efficiency, and luxury, either option is bound to impress.
Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail
X3
@ BMW Group Press
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes C-Class Wagon has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 42400 £, while the BMW X3 costs 51300 £. That’s a price difference of around 8815 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mercedes C-Class Wagon manages with 0.40 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the BMW X3 with 2.80 L. The difference is about 2.40 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Mercedes C-Class Wagon performs noticeable better – achieving up to 112 km, about 24 km more than the BMW X3.
C-Class Wagon
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes C-Class Wagon has a convincingly edge – offering 680 HP compared to 398 HP. That’s roughly 282 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes C-Class Wagon is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 3.40 s, while the BMW X3 takes 4.60 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mercedes C-Class Wagon performs to a small extent better – reaching 280 km/h, while the BMW X3 tops out at 250 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes C-Class Wagon pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 1020 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 350 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mercedes C-Class Wagon is hardly perceptible lighter – 1755 kg compared to 1930 kg. The difference is around 175 kg.
In terms of boot space, the BMW X3 offers somewhat more room – 570 L compared to 490 L. That’s a difference of about 80 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BMW X3 performs to a small extent better – up to 1700 L, which is about 190 L more than the Mercedes C-Class Wagon.
When it comes to payload, BMW X3 minimal takes the win – 570 kg compared to 565 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Mercedes C-Class Wagon proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mercedes C-Class Wagon is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £42,400
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Mercedes C-Class Wagon
BMW X3
The BMW X3 mixes Bavarian poise with everyday practicality, delivering a composed ride and a cabin that feels both premium and lived-in. It’s the sort of SUV that lets you enjoy sporty handling without sacrificing family-friendly space, so you get fun and sense in one neat package.
details
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
Mercedes C-Class Wagon
The Mercedes-Benz C-Class Wagon offers a perfect blend of luxury and practicality, appealing to those who value both style and functionality in their vehicle. Its elegant design is complemented by a spacious and versatile interior, making it ideal for family trips or business travel. With advanced safety features and state-of-the-art technology, this estate car provides a driving experience that is both secure and enjoyable.
details
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
BMW X3
Mercedes C-Class Wagon
|
@ BMW Group Press
|
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
51300 - 72400 £
|
Price
42400 - 115300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
88 km
|
Electric Range
11 - 112 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
19.50 kWh
|
|
co2
64 - 175 g/km
|
co2
11 - 206 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 65 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 - 66 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1930 - 2140 kg
|
Curb weight
1755 - 2235 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
460 - 570 L
|
Trunk capacity
360 - 490 L
|
|
Length
4755 mm
|
Length
4751 - 4842 mm
|
|
Width
1920 mm
|
Width
1820 - 1900 mm
|
|
Height
1660 mm
|
Height
1454 - 1494 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1600 - 1700 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1375 - 1510 L
|
|
Payload
570 kg
|
Payload
440 - 565 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
197 - 398 HP
|
Power HP
186 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.4 - 8.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
215 - 250 km/h
|
Max Speed
226 - 280 km/h
|
|
Torque
330 - 670 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 1020 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
145 - 293 kW
|
Power kW
137 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1995 - 2998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1496 - 1999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, G, B, D
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
What drive types are available for the BMW X3?
The BMW X3 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.