What drive types are available for the BMW X3?

The BMW X3 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the BMW X3's engine?

The BMW X3 reaches a peak output of 398 HP, depending on the model.

How much fuel does the BMW X3 use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 2.80 L.

What is the electric driving range of the BMW X3?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 88 km.

What is the top speed of the BMW X3?

The BMW X3 reaches up to 250 km/h.

What are the BMW X3’s length, width and height?

The BMW X3 measures 4755 mm long, 1920 mm wide and 1660 mm high.

What drive types are available for the Volvo XC40?

The Volvo XC40 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Volvo XC40's engine?

Up to 197 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Volvo XC40 according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 6.50 L.

What maximum speed does the Volvo XC40 reach?

The Volvo XC40 reaches up to 180 km/h.

What are the Volvo XC40’s length, width and height?

The Volvo XC40 measures 4425 mm long, 1863 mm wide and 1652 mm high.

BMW X3 vs Volvo XC40 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X3

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Volvo XC40 has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £ , while the BMW X3 costs 51300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14495 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: BMW X3 manages with 2.80 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 3.70 L per 100 km.

XC40

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW X3 has a clearly edge – offering 398 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 201 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X3 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 3 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the BMW X3 performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 70 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: BMW X3 pulls significantly stronger with 670 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 370 Nm difference.

X3

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is to a small extent lighter – 1688 kg compared to 1930 kg. The difference is around 242 kg.

In terms of boot space, the BMW X3 offers noticeable more room – 570 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 118 L.

In maximum load capacity, the BMW X3 performs noticeable better – up to 1700 L, which is about 372 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, BMW X3 slight takes the win – 570 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 38 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW X3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Reviews BMW X3

4.6 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (4 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

Nissan Qashqai

Volvo XC40

VS

The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …

Volvo XC40

VW T-Roc

VS

The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …

Costs and Consumption
Price 51300 - 72400 £	Price 36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 7.7 L	Consumption L/100km 6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 88 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 64 - 175 g/km	co2 147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 60 - 65 L	Fuel tank capacity 54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1930 - 2140 kg	Curb weight 1688 kg
Trunk capacity 460 - 570 L	Trunk capacity 452 L
Length 4755 mm	Length 4425 mm
Width 1920 mm	Width 1863 mm
Height 1660 mm	Height 1652 mm
Max trunk capacity 1700 L	Max trunk capacity 1328 L
Payload 570 kg	Payload 532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid	Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 197 - 398 HP	Power HP 163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.6 - 7.8 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed 215 - 250 km/h	Max Speed 180 km/h
Torque 330 - 670 Nm	Torque 265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4 - 6	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 145 - 293 kW	Power kW 120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity 1995 - 2998 cm3	Engine capacity 1969 cm3