VS

BMW XM vs Renault R5 comparison

Compare performance (748 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (116,100 £ vs 24,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW XM or Renault R5?

BMW XM vs Renault R5: Key differences

BMW XM

  • clearly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Renault R5

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XM

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault R5 is substantially cheaper – starting at 24,000 £ , while the BMW XM costs 116,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 92,142 £.

As for electric range, the Renault R5 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 405 km, about 325 km more than the BMW XM.

R5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW XM offers clearly more power – delivering 748 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 598 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW XM is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Renault R5 takes 8 s. That’s about 4.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW XM delivers clearly more torque with 1,000 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 755 Nm more.

XM

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: BMW XM offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Renault R5 is substantially lighter – 1,447 kg compared to 2,695 kg. The difference is around 1,248 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW XM offers clearly more boot space – 527 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 201 L.

When it comes to payload, the BMW XM carries clearly more – 525 kg compared to 418 kg. That’s a difference of about 107 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault R5 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,000
R5

Renault R5

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 122 - 150 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 15.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 307 - 405 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
Renault Twingo
VS
Renault R5 and Renault Twingo go head-to-head as the ultimate city-car choices: the retro‑chic R5 brings bold styling and contemporary tech, while the cheeky Twingo trades flair for ultra‑agile practicality and clever packaging. Choosing between them isn’t about specs on paper so much as …
Renault R5
VW ID.3
VS
The Renault 5 arrives as a cheeky retro reboot — compact, full of personality and perfect for nimble city living — while the VW ID.3 plays the sensible electric family car, offering more range, room and that reassuringly German calm. If you want fun and style for town runs choose the Renault 5; if …
BMW XM
Renault R5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW XM

The BMW XM is an unapologetically bold flagship that fuses brash, hyper-styled presence with the kind of luxury that commands attention wherever it goes. Inside it's a leather-clad showpiece loaded with modern tech and a driving personality that blends theatrical muscle with refined grand-tourer composure—ideal for buyers who want drama and comfort in equal measure.

details
P90478657_highRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x
P90478646_highRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x
P90478549_lowRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x
P90478580_lowRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x

Reviews BMW XM

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault R5

The Renault 5 is a cheeky city car that marries retro charm with modern flair, its playful looks promising smiles before you even start the engine. Practical enough for daily life yet lively enough to make short trips feel like mini adventures, it’s an irresistible choice for buyers who prefer personality to bland practicality.

details
D9BB3E56-4B0D-4E48-A734-11A1714B92A5
79A3C149-BC71-4BE3-A149-986DD84D251C
DDEACB99-545B-4C72-B12C-AB35E7B77365

Reviews Renault R5

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Walter
4 Nov 2025, 21:42:46

Practical, nimble, and fun to drive. For rather small drivers up to 1.75 m there's plenty of space even on the back seat. Useful driver-assist systems, and Android Auto works well. Very economical in summer. In winter a lot of energy is used in the first five minutes to bring the battery up to 20°C, which makes consumption on short winter trips very high.

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Born
Renault R5
VS
The CUPRA Born feels grown-up and focused — a proper hot‑hatch–inspired EV with genuine pace, sensible range and more practical space than its looks suggest, while the Renault 5 is a cheeky, retro‑flavoured city car built to charm tight streets rather than scorch the autobahn. Choose the Born if …
BYD Dolphin
Renault R5
VS
If you want no-nonsense electric practicality and impressive value for daily miles, the BYD Dolphin delivers usable range, clever packaging and tech that actually matters without breaking the bank. The Renault 5, meanwhile, sacrifices a little practicality for irresistible retro charm and …
Renault R5
VW ID.Polo
VS
This short comparison pits the Renault 5 against the Volkswagen ID. Polo to help you choose which compact electric suits your needs. We'll focus on design, range, practicality, driving feel and ownership costs so you can pick the right city car.
Renault R5
Nissan Micra
VS
The cheeky, retro-modern Renault 5 squares up against the urbane, sensible Nissan Micra — two compact contenders fighting for your city keys. We’ll compare style, practicality, driving feel and running costs to find out which is the smarter buy for everyday life.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Renault R5
Renault R4
VS
Choosing between the Renault 5 (R5) and the Renault 4 (R4) is a clash between two French icons: the R4’s rugged simplicity and practical load space versus the R5’s sharper styling, livelier driving feel and more modern features. If you want tough, no‑nonsense utility, lean to the R4; if you prefer …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Renault R5
VW Polo
VS
The Renault 5 (commonly called the R5) and the VW Polo are small hatchbacks aimed at city-focused buyers, but they take very different approaches—R5 leans into retro-styled electric chic while the Polo delivers proven practicality and conservative refinement. If you value modern EV character and …
BMW XM
Renault R5

Costs and Consumption
Price
116,100 - 159,300 £
Price
24,000 - 26,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
78 - 80 km
Electric Range
307 - 405 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 119 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,695 - 2,795 kg
Curb weight
1,447 - 1,524 kg
Trunk capacity
527 L
Trunk capacity
326 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,005 mm
Width
1,744 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 525 kg
Payload
396 - 418 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
476 - 748 HP
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 5.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
700 - 1,000 Nm
Torque
225 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
350 - 550 kW
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
2,998 - 4,395 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BMW
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the BMW XM?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.