Compare performance (136 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (31,600 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD ETP3 or Volvo XC40?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
BYD ETP3 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 31,600 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,142 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 offers visibly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Volvo XC40 is significantly faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the BYD ETP3 tops out at 100 km/h. The difference is around 80 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC40 delivers clearly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 180 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Volvo XC40 offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, BYD ETP3 is very slightly lighter – 1,640 kg compared to 1,688 kg. The difference is around 48 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the BYD ETP3 offers significantly more capacity – up to 3,500 L, about 2,172 L more than the Volvo XC40.
When it comes to payload, the BYD ETP3 carries clearly more – 780 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 248 kg.
The BYD ETP3 holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BYD ETP3 is a smart, no-nonsense electric offering that blends everyday practicality with a quietly modern design that won’t embarrass you in the supermarket car park. It’s ideal for buyers after fuss-free electric mobility — efficient, clever and just playful enough to make city driving a little more fun.
detailsThe Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
31,600 £
|
Price
36,800 - 47,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
233 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
147 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,640 kg
|
Curb weight
1,688 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
452 L
|
|
Length
4,460 mm
|
Length
4,425 mm
|
|
Width
1,720 mm
|
Width
1,863 mm
|
|
Height
1,875 mm
|
Height
1,652 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3,500 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,328 L
|
|
Payload
780 kg
|
Payload
532 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
100 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
180 Nm
|
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Volvo
|