Is the BYD Tang offered with different drivetrains?

The BYD Tang is available as All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the BYD Tang deliver on the road?

Up to 517 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the BYD Tang’s energy consumption?

In the WLTP cycle, the BYD Tang consumes around 24 kWh.

What is the electric driving range of the BYD Tang?

According to WLTP, the BYD Tang can travel up to 530 km on a single charge.

What are the dimensions of the BYD Tang?

Length 4970 mm, width 1955 mm, height 1745 mm – those are the dimensions of the BYD Tang.

Is the Kia XCeed offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia XCeed is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Kia XCeed?

Up to 180 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the Kia XCeed in liters per 100 km?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 6.40 L.

What are the Kia XCeed’s length, width and height?

Length 4395 mm, width 1826 mm, height 1483 mm – those are the dimensions of the Kia XCeed.

BYD Tang vs Kia XCeed - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tang

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Kia XCeed has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the BYD Tang costs 64300 £. That’s a price difference of around 41151 £.

XCeed

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Tang has a significantly edge – offering 517 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 337 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Tang is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Kia XCeed takes 8.50 s. That’s about 3.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Kia XCeed performs slight better – reaching 210 km/h, while the BYD Tang tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: BYD Tang pulls decisively stronger with 680 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 415 Nm difference.

Tang

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: BYD Tang offers noticeable more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Kia XCeed is significantly lighter – 1351 kg compared to 2630 kg. The difference is around 1279 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Kia XCeed offers decisively more room – 426 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 191 L.

In maximum load capacity, the BYD Tang performs to a small extent better – up to 1655 L, which is about 277 L more than the Kia XCeed.

When it comes to payload, BYD Tang somewhat takes the win – 575 kg compared to 479 kg. That’s a difference of about 96 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the BYD Tang shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews BYD Tang

Reviews Kia XCeed

4.8 (2 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

Kia Ceed

Kia XCeed

VS

If you want a sharper, more practical hatchback that still feels engaging behind the wheel, the Kia Ceed is the sensible, better-value pick with crisper handling and lower running costs. But if you crave a bit of SUV swagger, higher ride height and extra street presence for town runs and weekend …

Kia Niro

Kia XCeed

VS

In the battle of practicality and style, the Kia Niro and Kia XCeed stand out with their unique offerings. The Niro excels in fuel efficiency and eco-friendly technology, appealing to the environmentally conscious driver, while the XCeed boasts a sportier design and elevated driving position for …

Costs and Consumption
Price 64300 £	Price 23100 - 33000 £
Consumption L/100km -	Consumption L/100km 6.4 - 6.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km 24 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 530 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 0 g/km	co2 144 - 155 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity 50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 7	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 2630 kg	Curb weight 1351 - 1419 kg
Trunk capacity 235 L	Trunk capacity 426 L
Length 4970 mm	Length 4395 mm
Width 1955 mm	Width 1826 mm
Height 1745 mm	Height 1483 - 1495 mm
Max trunk capacity 1655 L	Max trunk capacity 1378 L
Payload 575 kg	Payload 471 - 479 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Electric	Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 517 HP	Power HP 115 - 180 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.90 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.5 - 11.7 s
Max Speed 190 km/h	Max Speed 182 - 210 km/h
Torque 680 Nm	Torque 200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders -	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 380 kW	Power kW 85 - 132 kW
Engine capacity -	Engine capacity 998 - 1598 cm3