Compare performance (180 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 29,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia XCeed or Nissan Qashqai?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving landscape of compact SUVs, two contenders stand out for 2024: the Kia XCeed and the Nissan Qashqai. Both models have carved their niche with unique features while catering to the diverse needs of modern drivers. Let's dive into the technical aspects and innovations of each vehicle to determine which one might suit you best.
The Kia XCeed offers a choice of petrol engines with options delivering up to 140 HP, paired with either a manual gearbox or a dual-clutch automatic transmission. The vehicle is front-wheel drive and can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 10.2 seconds, reaching top speeds of 195 km/h. With various cylinder configurations and a substantial torque of 253 Nm, the XCeed is designed for a balanced mix of efficiency and performance.
In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai is available with both petrol MHEV and full hybrid configurations. It's more versatile in driving options, providing both front-wheel and all-wheel drive choices, with power ranging up to 190 HP. The Qashqai shines in acceleration, capable of reaching 100 km/h in just 7.9 seconds for its upper variants, hitting maximum speeds of up to 206 km/h with a robust torque capacity of 330 Nm.
When it comes to fuel consumption, the Kia XCeed averages between 6.3 to 6.5 L/100km. While offering efficient performance, it aligns closely in environmental impact classification with a CO2 efficiency class of E and emissions ranging between 143 and 148 g/km.
The Nissan Qashqai provides more versatility with its hybrid model, lowering fuel consumption to 5.1 L/100km in some variants. The CO2 efficiency class lies between D and E, with emissions as low as 116 g/km, making it potentially a more eco-friendly choice than the XCeed, particularly in hybrid form.
Design-wise, the Kia XCeed is slightly more compact with a length of 4395 mm, width of 1826 mm, and a height of 1495 mm. Its design embraces modern aesthetics while the trunk space of 426 liters makes it practical for daily use.
The Nissan Qashqai, on the other hand, offers more room with a length of 4425 mm, a width of 1835 mm, and a height of 1625 mm. It boasts a larger trunk capacity, reaching up to 504 liters. This additional space accommodates larger family and cargo requirements with ease.
Both the Kia XCeed and the Nissan Qashqai exhibit impressive attributes, yet cater to different consumer preferences. If you prioritize a compact size with ample power and an engaging driving experience, the Kia XCeed might be more appealing. However, if versatility in engine configurations, eco-friendliness, and cargo space are at the top of your list, the Nissan Qashqai stands out as the better choice.
Ultimately, the decision boils down to personal preference and individual needs, whether it's performance, economy, or utility at the forefront of importance.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Kia XCeed is noticeably cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,471 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Qashqai uses 4.3 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai offers moderately more power – delivering 205 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 25 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Kia XCeed takes 8.5 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Qashqai delivers slightly more torque with 330 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Kia XCeed is only slightly lighter – 1,351 kg compared to 1,420 kg. The difference is around 69 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers a bit more boot space – 504 L compared to 426 L. That’s a difference of about 78 L.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Qashqai carries barely more – 516 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 31 kg.
The Nissan Qashqai is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Kia XCeed blends hatchback agility with a coupe-like stance, wrapping practical space in a handsome, modern package that punches above its class in style. It’s an easygoing everyday companion — comfy, well-equipped and priced to make sensible buyers smile — with just enough spark to keep weekend drives interesting.
details
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,100 - 33,000 £
|
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.3 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
143 - 155 g/km
|
co2
98 - 152 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,351 - 1,419 kg
|
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,624 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
426 L
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,826 mm
|
Width
1,835 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
471 - 485 kg
|
Payload
446 - 516 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
158 - 205 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 12.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 330 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
116 - 151 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España