Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Kia XCeed or Nissan Qashqai?
In the ever-evolving landscape of compact SUVs, two contenders stand out for 2024: the Kia XCeed and the Nissan Qashqai. Both models have carved their niche with unique features while catering to the diverse needs of modern drivers. Let's dive into the technical aspects and innovations of each vehicle to determine which one might suit you best.
The Kia XCeed offers a choice of petrol engines with options delivering up to 140 HP, paired with either a manual gearbox or a dual-clutch automatic transmission. The vehicle is front-wheel drive and can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 10.2 seconds, reaching top speeds of 195 km/h. With various cylinder configurations and a substantial torque of 253 Nm, the XCeed is designed for a balanced mix of efficiency and performance.
In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai is available with both petrol MHEV and full hybrid configurations. It's more versatile in driving options, providing both front-wheel and all-wheel drive choices, with power ranging up to 190 HP. The Qashqai shines in acceleration, capable of reaching 100 km/h in just 7.9 seconds for its upper variants, hitting maximum speeds of up to 206 km/h with a robust torque capacity of 330 Nm.
When it comes to fuel consumption, the Kia XCeed averages between 6.3 to 6.5 L/100km. While offering efficient performance, it aligns closely in environmental impact classification with a CO2 efficiency class of E and emissions ranging between 143 and 148 g/km.
The Nissan Qashqai provides more versatility with its hybrid model, lowering fuel consumption to 5.1 L/100km in some variants. The CO2 efficiency class lies between D and E, with emissions as low as 116 g/km, making it potentially a more eco-friendly choice than the XCeed, particularly in hybrid form.
Design-wise, the Kia XCeed is slightly more compact with a length of 4395 mm, width of 1826 mm, and a height of 1495 mm. Its design embraces modern aesthetics while the trunk space of 426 liters makes it practical for daily use.
The Nissan Qashqai, on the other hand, offers more room with a length of 4425 mm, a width of 1835 mm, and a height of 1625 mm. It boasts a larger trunk capacity, reaching up to 504 liters. This additional space accommodates larger family and cargo requirements with ease.
Both the Kia XCeed and the Nissan Qashqai exhibit impressive attributes, yet cater to different consumer preferences. If you prioritize a compact size with ample power and an engaging driving experience, the Kia XCeed might be more appealing. However, if versatility in engine configurations, eco-friendliness, and cargo space are at the top of your list, the Nissan Qashqai stands out as the better choice.
Ultimately, the decision boils down to personal preference and individual needs, whether it's performance, economy, or utility at the forefront of importance.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Kia XCeed has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29600 £. That’s a price difference of around 6471 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Qashqai manages with 4.50 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.40 L. The difference is about 1.90 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai has a to a small extent edge – offering 205 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 25 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Kia XCeed takes 8.50 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Kia XCeed performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Nissan Qashqai tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Qashqai pulls a bit stronger with 330 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Kia XCeed is hardly perceptible lighter – 1351 kg compared to 1420 kg. The difference is around 69 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers a bit more room – 504 L compared to 426 L. That’s a difference of about 78 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Qashqai performs minimal better – up to 1447 L, which is about 69 L more than the Kia XCeed.
When it comes to payload, Nissan Qashqai barely noticeable takes the win – 520 kg compared to 479 kg. That’s a difference of about 41 kg.
Overall, the Nissan Qashqai shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Kia XCeed blends hatchback agility with a coupe-like stance, wrapping practical space in a handsome, modern package that punches above its class in style. It’s an easygoing everyday companion — comfy, well-equipped and priced to make sensible buyers smile — with just enough spark to keep weekend drives interesting.
details
@ Kia Corporation
@ Kia Corporation
@ Kia Corporation
@ Kia Corporation
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
|
@ Kia Corporation
|
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23100 - 33000 £
|
Price
29600 - 39900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.4 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
144 - 155 g/km
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1351 - 1419 kg
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
426 L
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
|
Length
4395 mm
|
Length
4425 mm
|
|
Width
1826 mm
|
Width
1835 mm
|
|
Height
1483 - 1495 mm
|
Height
1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1378 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
|
|
Payload
471 - 479 kg
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 11.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
182 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Nissan
|
The Kia XCeed is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España