VS

BYD Tang vs MINI Aceman comparison

Compare performance (517 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (64,300 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Tang or MINI Aceman?

BYD Tang vs MINI Aceman: Key differences

BYD Tang

  • considerably more power
  • noticeably more electric range
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • significantly lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tang

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MINI Aceman is clearly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the BYD Tang costs 64,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 37,285 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is considerably more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 24 kWh/100km for the BYD Tang. That’s a difference of about 9.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the BYD Tang offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 530 km, about 175 km more than the MINI Aceman.

Aceman

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Tang offers considerably more power – delivering 517 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 259 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Tang is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.4 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Tang delivers clearly more torque with 680 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 330 Nm more.

Tang

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: BYD Tang offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is significantly lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 2,630 kg. The difference is around 910 kg.

Looking at boot space, the MINI Aceman offers markedly more boot space – 300 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 65 L.

When it comes to payload, the BYD Tang carries very slightly more – 575 kg compared to 530 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Aceman comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
Aceman

MINI Aceman

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 184 - 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 309 - 355 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Tang
BYD Sealion 7
VS
The BYD Tang wears its SUV badge proudly — big, bold and businesslike, with a roomy cabin, high driving position and enough tech to turn family road trips into comfortable command missions. The BYD Sealion 7 is the sleeker, more carlike alternative, trading some bulk for sharper handling, better …
MINI Aceman
VW ID.3
VS
The MINI Aceman and the Volkswagen ID.3 offer two distinct takes on the compact electric car: the Aceman leans on MINI’s character and driver-focused feel, while the ID.3 emphasizes efficiency, roomy interior and everyday practicality. This comparison will cut through the specs to show where they …
BYD Tang
MINI Aceman

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BYD Tang

The BYD Tang is a bold, tech-loaded SUV that blends striking design with roomy practicality, making it equally at home on the school run and the open road. Packed with clever tech and a powertrain that mixes efficiency with eager performance, it’s a smart, value-focused pick for buyers who want electric-age comfort without the premium-brand fuss.

details
8ee4e329-3f72-45c5-9cb4-b63b5ddb555e
de335338-ec26-419d-842a-9f53ec65c2c6
9fcec901-74bd-4e0f-8761-2897e2f597bf
24737df2-4e98-4799-b7e2-d4d5c2437265
c342d66a-80aa-4960-abc4-26de29271816

Reviews BYD Tang

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
P90545616_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90545628_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90547839_highRes_the-new-mini-aceman-

Reviews MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
GEORGXRM
5 Jan 2026, 00:44:07

Amazing interior, sporty-funky exterior, great handles, good amount of power.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

MINI Aceman
MINI Countryman
VS
Comparing the MINI Aceman and the MINI Countryman helps you decide between a compact, city-focused crossover and a roomier, more practical small SUV. The Aceman prioritises agile handling, crisp urban packaging and striking style, while the Countryman brings more interior space, versatile cargo …
BYD Tang
XPeng G9
VS
BYD Tang and XPeng G9 are two compelling Chinese-built electric SUVs that target buyers looking for space and modern EV tech. The Tang leans toward practical value, strong charging and multi-powertrain options, while the XPeng G9 prioritizes premium refinement, advanced driver assistance and a …
MINI Aceman
Renault R5
VS
The MINI Aceman feels like a posh city rocket — cheeky handling, premium finishes and a slick interior make it the choice for drivers who want style and go‑kart fun wrapped in crossover practicality. The Renault 5, by contrast, pares back the flash for retro charm, more usable space and a …
MINI Aceman
Renault R4
VS
MINI Aceman and Renault R4 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the MINI Aceman or the Renault …
BYD Tang
Polestar 3
VS
BYD Tang and Polestar 3 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BYD Tang or the Polestar 3 is …
BYD Tang
Hyundai IONIQ 9
VS
BYD Tang and Hyundai IONIQ 9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BYD Tang or the Hyundai …
BYD Tang
Omoda 9
VS
BYD Tang and Omoda 9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BYD Tang or the Omoda 9 is the …
Fiat 600
MINI Aceman
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Fiat 600 takes on the MINI Aceman, showcasing two distinct approaches to modern compact cars. The Fiat 600 offers a retro-inspired design with a focus on urban practicality, while the MINI Aceman blends iconic styling with advanced electric performance. Both models …
BYD Tang
MINI Aceman

Costs and Consumption
Price
64,300 £
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
24 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
Electric Range
530 km
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,630 kg
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
Trunk capacity
235 L
Trunk capacity
300 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,955 mm
Width
1,754 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
575 kg
Payload
450 - 530 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
517 HP
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
680 Nm
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
380 kW
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BYD
Brand
MINI
Is the BYD Tang offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.