Compare performance (145 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (16200 £ vs 15400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C3 Aircross or Dacia Jogger?
In the bustling world of subcompact crossovers and multipurpose vehicles, the Citroen C3 Aircross and Dacia Jogger make a compelling case for practicality and innovation. Both models, well-poised to capture versatile utility, offer distinctive attributes tailored for drivers seeking a blend of comfort, efficiency, and space.
The Citroen C3 Aircross embraces an SUV aesthetic, capturing attention with its modern design and robust stance. Measuring 4,395 mm in length, 1,795 mm in width, and 1,660 mm in height, it commands an assertive presence on the road. With a 5-seater configuration and a roomy trunk capacity of 460 liters, it caters to those who require ample space for both passengers and cargo.
Conversely, the Dacia Jogger is built as an MPV, reflecting its emphasis on extended utility. With a longer body at 4,547 mm, a slightly narrower width of 1,784 mm, and a taller height of 1,674 mm, it offers flexibility between a 5 or 7-seater arrangement. Notably, its trunk capacity can expand up to 607 liters, accommodating the needs of larger families and long-haul travelers alike.
The Citroen C3 Aircross presents a spectrum of engine choices, including petrol MHEV, petrol, and fully electric variants. With power outputs ranging from 101 HP to 136 HP and CO2 emissions between 0 to 139 g/km, it offers an eco-conscious driving experience. Its electric version delivers a commendable range of up to 306 km and accelerates from 0-100 km/h in just 11 to 11.4 seconds.
The Dacia Jogger offers a different strategy, leveraging full hybrid, LPG, and petrol engine configurations. Output varies between 91 HP and 140 HP, with commendable fuel consumption rates, particularly the hybrid variant at 4.7 L/100km. The model excels in its CO2 efficiency, achieving as low as 105 g/km, and delivers solid performance with acceleration times ranging from 9.8 to 13.2 seconds.
Citroen has infused the C3 Aircross with cutting-edge tech, such as advanced driver assistance systems and dual-clutch automatic transmission options. The electric model showcases innovative solutions like a reduction gearbox and regenerative braking to maximize efficiency.
Dacia, known for its no-frills approach, provides the Jogger with a suite of practical features, such as an easy-fold seating system and adaptable cargo space configurations. The focus is on user-friendliness and reliability rather than luxurious embellishments, appealing to budget-conscious consumers.
Both cars are designed to offer excellent value. The Citroen C3 Aircross, with its diverse engine lineup and electric innovation, might appeal more to those looking for modern aesthetics and advanced technologies. The Dacia Jogger, on the other hand, stands as a testament to practicality with extra seating capacity and economical running costs, appealing to families and utility-minded drivers.
Choosing between the Citroen C3 Aircross and Dacia Jogger ultimately boils down to individual lifestyle needs. If cutting-edge technology and an SUV feel are central to your preferences, the C3 Aircross might be your match. For those prioritizing spacious interiors and affordability, the Jogger distinctively stands out. Either way, both models represent the automotive world's adaptive response to contemporary consumer demands for versatility and eco-efficiency.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Dacia Jogger has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15400 £ , while the Citroen C3 Aircross costs 16200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 771 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Dacia Jogger manages with 4.50 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Citroen C3 Aircross with 5.30 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Dacia Jogger has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 158 HP compared to 145 HP. That’s roughly 13 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Dacia Jogger is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 8.90 s, while the Citroen C3 Aircross takes 12.30 s. That’s about 3.40 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Citroen C3 Aircross pulls somewhat stronger with 230 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Dacia Jogger offers noticeable more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Dacia Jogger is barely noticeable lighter – 1268 kg compared to 1312 kg. The difference is around 44 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Dacia Jogger offers evident more room – 607 L compared to 460 L. That’s a difference of about 147 L.
When it comes to payload, Dacia Jogger a bit takes the win – 559 kg compared to 462 kg. That’s a difference of about 97 kg.
The Dacia Jogger is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Citroën C3 Aircross is a cheeky compact SUV that trades bland conformity for playful French character and clever practicality, ideal if you want a car with personality. It soaks up city life with a comfortable ride, inventive cabin tricks and a look that turns heads without asking for attention.
details
The Dacia Jogger is a no-nonsense family mover that stretches the idea of value with cavernous practicality and flexible space, perfect for buyers who need a sensible, everyday Swiss Army knife on wheels. It doesn’t try to be glamorous — instead it wins hearts with cheerful thrift, durable materials and honest engineering, giving you useful transport without the pretence.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
16200 - 28200 £
|
Price
15400 - 23500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 7.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.1 - 18.3 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
303 - 400 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 134 g/km
|
co2
103 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
MPV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1312 - 1608 kg
|
Curb weight
1268 - 1463 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
460 L
|
Trunk capacity
160 - 607 L
|
|
Length
4395 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1795 mm
|
Width
1784 mm
|
|
Height
1640 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1600 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
407 - 462 kg
|
Payload
384 - 559 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, LPG
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
101 - 145 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 13 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12 s
|
|
Max Speed
143 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
125 - 230 Nm
|
Torque
190 - 200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 107 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Dacia
|
The Citroen C3 Aircross is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España