VS

Citroen C3 vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (113 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (14,000 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C3 or Mazda CX-80?

Citroen C3 vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Citroen C3

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • considerably lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Citroen C3 is significantly cheaper – starting at 14,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 35,366 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Citroen C3 with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Citroen C3 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 325 km, about 265 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 214 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Citroen C3 takes 9.9 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers considerably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 345 Nm more.

C3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 is considerably lighter – 1,226 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 905 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Citroen C3 offers a bit more boot space – 310 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 52 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 423 kg. That’s a difference of about 227 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Citroen C3 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £14,000
C3

Citroen C3

  • Engine Type Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic, Manual
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 101 - 113 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 212 - 325 km
Citroen C3
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Citroen C3

The Citroën C3 is a stylish and practical small hatchback that puts comfort and a calm urban driving experience at the top of its list. With its distinctive looks and thoughtful interior touches, it suits buyers who want personality and everyday usability without drama.

details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
Citroen C3
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption

Price
14,000 - 24,700 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
212 - 325 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 126 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,226 - 1,518 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
310 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,755 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
227 - 423 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Plug-in Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
101 - 113 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 12 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
120 - 205 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
74 - 83 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.