VS

Citroen C3 vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (113 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (13,700 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C3 or Renault Arkana?

Citroen C3 vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

Citroen C3

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • barely more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Citroen C3 is significantly cheaper – starting at 13,700 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,752 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Citroen C3 with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Arkana offers clearly more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 30 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Citroen C3 is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 9.9 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

Both models offer the same torque – 205 Nm.

C3

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 is noticeably lighter – 1,226 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 284 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries only slightly more – 451 kg compared to 423 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Citroen C3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £13,700
C3

Citroen C3

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 101 - 113 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 212 - 325 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3
Citroen C3 Aircross
VS
Deciding between the Citroën C3 and the Citroën C3 Aircross is basically a choice between a compact, city-focused hatch and a taller, more practical crossover. The C3 prioritises nimble handling, simplicity and economy for urban driving, while the C3 Aircross adds higher ride height, extra interior …
Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Citroen C3
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Citroen C3

The Citroën C3 is a stylish and practical small hatchback that puts comfort and a calm urban driving experience at the top of its list. With its distinctive looks and thoughtful interior touches, it suits buyers who want personality and everyday usability without drama.

details
CITROEN_C3_25
CITROEN_C3_26
CITROEN_C3_44
12D30_01

Reviews Citroen C3

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3
Renault Captur
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you want a compact, comfort-focused hatch with quirky styling or a slightly larger, more versatile crossover with a higher driving position. I’ll compare practicality, fuel economy, driving feel and value so you can pick …
Citroen C3
Fiat Panda
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 and the Fiat Panda often comes down to whether you want a comfort-focused, stylish city hatch or a no-nonsense, practical small car. I’ll highlight the key differences in interior space, fuel economy, driving feel and running costs so you can decide which suits your …
Citroen C3
Citroen C4
VS
The Citroën C3 is the cheeky city hatch that charms with low running costs, soft suspension and easy parking, while the Citroën C4 stretches into crossover territory with more space, stronger engines and sharper tech. If you mostly nip around town grab the C3 for its thrift and comfort; if you want …
Citroen C3
Opel Corsa
VS
The Citroën C3 charms with its quirky French flair, plush seats and a ride tuned more for comfort than cornering, while the Opel Corsa plays the sensible all-rounder with sharper handling, a tidier cabin and a broader engine lineup. If you want personality and city-friendly cushioning, pick the C3; …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
Citroen C3
MG MG3
VS
Comparing the Citroën C3 and the MG3 puts two budget-friendly city hatchbacks head-to-head: the C3 leans toward comfort, distinctive styling and a refined ride, while the MG3 focuses on low cost, generous interior space and straightforward practicality. If you value a plush, design-led small car go …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Citroen C3
Fiat Grande Panda
VS
Comparing the Citroën C3 and the Fiat Panda shows two different takes on small cars: the C3 emphasises comfort, style and a quieter ride, while the Panda prioritises practicality, space efficiency and rugged simplicity. Choose the C3 for a refined, tech-friendly city runabout; choose the Panda for …
Citroen C3
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
13,700 - 24,600 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
212 - 325 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 126 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,226 - 1,518 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
310 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,755 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
227 - 423 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
101 - 113 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 12 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
120 - 205 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
74 - 83 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Citroen C3 have?

The Citroen C3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.