Compare performance (113 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (13,700 £ vs 22,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C3 or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Citroen C3 is considerably cheaper – starting at 13,700 £ , while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van costs 22,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,735 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen C3 uses 5 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Citroen C3 is somewhat more efficient: consuming 16.7 kWh/100km compared to 18.7 kWh/100km for the Renault Kangoo Compact Van. That’s a difference of about 2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Citroen C3 offers moderately more range – reaching up to 325 km, about 35 km more than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van offers barely more power – delivering 122 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Citroen C3 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 9.9 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 11.6 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van is visibly faster – reaching 176 km/h, while the Citroen C3 tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 44 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Kangoo Compact Van delivers clearly more torque with 270 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 is noticeably lighter – 1,226 kg compared to 1,493 kg. The difference is around 267 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van offers considerably more capacity – up to 4,900 L, about 3,680 L more than the Citroen C3.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van carries considerably more – 901 kg compared to 423 kg. That’s a difference of about 478 kg.
The Renault Kangoo Compact Van is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Citroën C3 is a cheeky little city car that turns heads with its bold, quirky styling and a surprisingly comfy, well-thought-out interior. It’s an ideal companion for urban life — easy to park, friendly to drive and built to make everyday trips feel a bit more fun without breaking the bank.
detailsThe Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
13,700 - 24,600 £
|
Price
22,400 - 37,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 20.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
212 - 325 km
|
Electric Range
270 - 290 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 126 g/km
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,226 - 1,518 kg
|
Curb weight
1,493 - 1,910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
310 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,015 mm
|
Length
4,486 - 4,910 mm
|
|
Width
1,755 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
1,567 mm
|
Height
1,854 - 1,864 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,220 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3,300 - 4,900 L
|
|
Payload
227 - 423 kg
|
Payload
498 - 901 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
101 - 113 HP
|
Power HP
75 - 122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 12 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 18.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 - 176 km/h
|
|
Torque
120 - 205 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 83 kW
|
Power kW
55 - 90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Renault
|