Compare performance (113 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (13,700 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C3 or Suzuki Vitara?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The compact SUV market continues to thrive as automotive manufacturers innovate and develop vehicles that cater to the needs of modern drivers. Among the choices available, the Citroën C3 and Suzuki Vitara stand out for their distinctive styles and exceptional features. This article dives into a detailed comparison of these two models, examining technical aspects and innovations that could influence your buying decision.
Both the Citroën C3 and Suzuki Vitara embody the SUV essence, yet their design philosophies present varied interpretations. The Citroën C3 measures 4015 mm in length, 1755 mm in width, and 1567 mm in height, giving it a compact and agile appearance. In contrast, the Suzuki Vitara is slightly larger at 4185 mm in length, 1775 mm in width, and 1595 mm in height, providing a more robust and rugged look.
The C3 features a modern aesthetic with smooth lines and a distinctive front grille, contributing to an attractive user-friendly design. The Vitara, however, emphasizes an adventurous appeal with its boxy silhouette and bold stance, making it more suitable for off-road excursions. Both models have five doors and comfortably accommodate five passengers, ensuring practicality for everyday use.
When it comes to engine options, the Citroën C3 offers a variety of configurations, including petrol, electric, and petrol MHEV engines, providing power ratings from 101 to 113 HP. The C3’s engines are complemented by a front-wheel-drive system, ensuring a smooth driving experience on city roads. The model’s 1.2-liter 3-cylinder engine achieves a fuel consumption of approximately 5.5 to 5.6 L/100km, presenting a commendable balance between performance and efficiency.
On the other hand, the Suzuki Vitara showcases a different edge with hybrid offerings, featuring petrol MHEV and full hybrid options that can produce up to 129 HP. With both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, the Vitara is versatile enough to handle a variety of terrains while maintaining a fuel consumption range of 5.0 to 5.6 L/100km. The Vitara's 1.4-liter 4-cylinder engine is also known for its impressive torque of 235 Nm, enhancing its performance during acceleration.
Speed enthusiasts may appreciate the performance metrics of these two cars. The Citroën C3 can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in about 9.9 to 11 seconds, depending on the engine variant. The top speed reaches 183 km/h, making it suitable for both city and highway driving.
Meanwhile, the Suzuki Vitara boasts acceleration figures that outshine the C3, with times ranging from 9.5 to 10.2 seconds for its various configurations. It can achieve a top speed of 190 km/h, indicating its capability for more spirited driving experiences. This performance edge makes the Vitara appealing for those desiring a bit more excitement behind the wheel.
Environmental concerns and fuel efficiency have become pivotal in the automotive industry. The Citroën C3, with a CO2 emissions range of 123 to 126 g/km, falls into CO2 efficiency classes D and A, indicating a moderate approach to emissions. Notably, the electric variant boasts a zero-emission option, showcasing Citroën's commitment to sustainable driving.
In comparison, the Suzuki Vitara excels in this area with emissions ranging from 113 to 129 g/km, landing it firmly within CO2 efficiency class C and D. This eco-friendly stance, paired with the hybrid model's capabilities, makes the Vitara a strong contender for environmentally conscious consumers.
Space and comfort remain top priorities in the compact SUV segment. The Citroën C3 offers a trunk capacity of 310 liters, which is respectable for everyday use. Features such as a well-designed interior, advanced infotainment systems, and ergonomic seating reflect Citroën’s focus on passenger comfort.
Conversely, the Suzuki Vitara shines with a larger trunk capacity of 375 liters, granting it an advantage for those requiring extra storage. The cabin is equipped with a host of modern technologies, including a user-friendly touchscreen infotainment system and various safety features, presenting an appealing package for tech-savvy drivers.
Both the Citroën C3 and Suzuki Vitara offer unique advantages, catering to various driving needs and preferences. The C3 balances style and efficiency with versatile engine options, while the Vitara excels in performance and practicality, particularly for those seeking adventure. Ultimately, the decision between these two models hinges on individual priorities—whether you prefer the compact agility of the C3 or the robust versatility of the Vitara.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Citroen C3 is considerably cheaper – starting at 13,700 £ , while the Suzuki Vitara costs 23,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,866 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen C3 uses 5 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Suzuki Vitara is slightly more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 16.7 kWh/100km for the Citroen C3. That’s a difference of about 1.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Suzuki Vitara offers markedly more range – reaching up to 426 km, about 101 km more than the Citroen C3.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara offers visibly more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 71 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Citroen C3 takes 9.9 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Vitara delivers visibly more torque with 307 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 102 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 is barely lighter – 1,226 kg compared to 1,255 kg. The difference is around 29 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Vitara offers moderately more boot space – 375 L compared to 310 L. That’s a difference of about 65 L.
When it comes to payload, the Suzuki Vitara carries very slightly more – 425 kg compared to 423 kg. That’s a difference of about 2 kg.
The Suzuki Vitara is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Citroën C3 is a stylish and practical small hatchback that puts comfort and a calm urban driving experience at the top of its list. With its distinctive looks and thoughtful interior touches, it suits buyers who want personality and everyday usability without drama.
details
The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
13,700 - 24,600 £
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
212 - 325 km
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 126 g/km
|
co2
0 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,226 - 1,518 kg
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
310 L
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,755 mm
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
227 - 423 kg
|
Payload
395 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
101 - 113 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 12 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
120 - 205 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 83 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España