Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Citroen C5 Aircross vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (210 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (29100 £ vs 43300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C5 Aircross or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
C5 Aircross
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Citroen C5 Aircross has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14151 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Citroen C5 Aircross manages with 2.50 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.70 L. The difference is about 1.20 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Citroen C5 Aircross performs convincingly better – achieving up to 520 km, about 460 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a noticeable edge – offering 269 HP compared to 210 HP. That’s roughly 59 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.20 s, while the Citroen C5 Aircross takes 8.30 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Citroen C5 Aircross performs barely noticeable better – reaching 220 km/h, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque tops out at 213 km/h. The difference is around 7 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque pulls clearly stronger with 540 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 240 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
C5 Aircross
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Citroen C5 Aircross is to a small extent lighter – 1629 kg compared to 1792 kg. The difference is around 163 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Citroen C5 Aircross offers to a small extent more room – 565 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 93 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Citroen C5 Aircross performs evident better – up to 1668 L, which is about 512 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque evident takes the win – 600 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 129 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Citroen C5 Aircross proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Citroen C5 Aircross is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £29,100
Citroen C5 Aircross
Citroen C5 Aircross
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Citroen C5 Aircross
5 (1 Reviews)
The Citroën C5 Aircross feels like a sofa on wheels, delivering a calm, floaty ride and clever packaging that makes life with luggage and kids noticeably easier. Quirky French styling and a supremely practical, family-focused cabin mean it quietly wins hearts by prioritising comfort over showroom bravado.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
1 (1 Reviews)
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Citroen C5 Aircross
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29100 - 41600 £
|
Price
43300 - 64800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
81 - 520 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
17.8 - 73 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 121 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1629 - 2184 kg
|
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
565 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4650 mm
|
Length
4371 mm
|
|
Width
1870 mm
|
Width
1900 mm
|
|
Height
1695 mm
|
Height
1649 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1668 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
|
|
Payload
446 - 471 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 210 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 220 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 157 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drive types are available for the Citroen C5 Aircross?
The Citroen C5 Aircross is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.