Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Jumpy Transporter or Renault Kangoo?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Kangoo has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter costs 32100 £. That’s a price difference of around 9073 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Kangoo manages with 5.20 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter with 6.20 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Renault Kangoo: with 20.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter with 23.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.40 kWh.
As for range, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter performs to a small extent better – achieving up to 328 km, about 43 km more than the Renault Kangoo.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 180 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 50 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Kangoo is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 11.60 s, while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter takes 12.10 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Renault Kangoo performs slightly better – reaching 184 km/h, while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Citroen Jumpy Transporter pulls distinct stronger with 400 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Renault Kangoo offers a bit more seating capacity – 7 vs 6.
In curb weight, Renault Kangoo is slight lighter – 1585 kg compared to 1722 kg. The difference is around 137 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter performs convincingly better – up to 6100 L, which is about 3050 L more than the Renault Kangoo.
When it comes to payload, Citroen Jumpy Transporter clearly takes the win – 1226 kg compared to 609 kg. That’s a difference of about 617 kg.
Overall, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
The Citroen Jumpy Transporter exemplifies versatility and practicality, making it an ideal choice for both urban and long-distance driving. With its spacious interior and advanced features, it caters to a range of commercial needs while ensuring comfort for the driver. The Jumpy also boasts a contemporary design, reflecting Citroen's commitment to style and functionality.
detailsThe Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32100 - 52000 £
|
Price
23100 - 36200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.1 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24.7 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.2 - 21.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
222 - 328 km
|
Electric Range
278 - 285 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 199 g/km
|
co2
0 - 161 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
69 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1722 - 2188 kg
|
Curb weight
1585 - 2041 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 950 L
|
|
Length
4959 - 5309 mm
|
Length
4486 - 4911 mm
|
|
Width
1920 mm
|
Width
1860 - 1919 mm
|
|
Height
1895 - 1935 mm
|
Height
1838 - 1869 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3200 - 6100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1296 - 3050 L
|
|
Payload
881 - 1226 kg
|
Payload
400 - 609 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 15.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
130 - 160 km/h
|
Max Speed
130 - 184 km/h
|
|
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1499 - 2184 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2022 - 2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, A
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Renault
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.