VS

Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Volvo EX90 comparison

Compare performance (180 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (32,100 £ vs 72,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Jumpy Transporter or Volvo EX90?

Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Volvo EX90: Key differences

Citroen Jumpy Transporter

  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

Volvo EX90

2.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Jumpy Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Citroen Jumpy Transporter is substantially cheaper – starting at 32,100 £ , while the Volvo EX90 costs 72,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 40,032 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX90 is clearly more efficient: consuming 17.8 kWh/100km compared to 23.6 kWh/100km for the Citroen Jumpy Transporter. That’s a difference of about 5.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX90 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 620 km, about 292 km more than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter.

EX90

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 offers significantly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 500 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX90 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter takes 12.1 s. That’s about 7.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX90 delivers substantially more torque with 870 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 470 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Volvo EX90 offers more seats – 7 vs 6.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen Jumpy Transporter is considerably lighter – 1,722 kg compared to 2,555 kg. The difference is around 833 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter carries clearly more – 1,226 kg compared to 605 kg. That’s a difference of about 621 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX90 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £72,200
EX90

Volvo EX90

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 333 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 570 - 620 km
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Volvo EX90

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Citroen Jumpy Transporter

The Citroën Dispatch is a steady, no-nonsense transporter that swallows workday demands with quiet confidence while keeping drivers comfortable on long runs. Practical, economical and unfussy, it’s the kind of van that won’t steal the show but will make sure your business runs smoother — and that’s often exactly what you want.

details

Volvo EX90

The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.

details
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Volvo EX90

Costs and Consumption

Price
32,100 - 52,000 £
Price
72,200 - 91,700 £
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
222 - 328 km
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 199 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
3 - 6
Seats
6 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,722 - 2,188 kg
Curb weight
2,555 - 2,765 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,964 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
881 - 1,226 kg
Payload
545 - 605 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.