Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Fiat Panda vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (70 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (14100 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Panda or Skoda Kodiaq?
Panda
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Fiat Panda has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 14100 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22714 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Fiat Panda with 5 L. The difference is about 3.50 L per 100 km.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a convincingly edge – offering 265 HP compared to 70 HP. That’s roughly 195 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Fiat Panda takes 13.90 s. That’s about 7.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Fiat Panda tops out at 164 km/h. The difference is around 67 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls convincingly stronger with 400 Nm compared to 92 Nm. That’s about 308 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Panda
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Skoda Kodiaq offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Fiat Panda is significantly lighter – 1055 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 629 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more room – 910 L compared to 225 L. That’s a difference of about 685 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs clearly better – up to 2105 L, which is about 1235 L more than the Fiat Panda.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq evident takes the win – 563 kg compared to 365 kg. That’s a difference of about 198 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Fiat Panda
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Skoda Kodiaq
Fiat Panda
5 (1 Reviews)
The Panda is a charming, no-nonsense city companion that mixes cheerful Italian flair with genuinely useful practicality, making tight streets and daily errands feel less of a chore. Its honest simplicity, clever packaging and a dash of cheeky character make it a smart, low-stress buy for people who prefer sensible perks over showroom flash.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Fiat Panda
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
14100 £
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
113 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
38 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1055 kg
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
225 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
3635 mm
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
|
Width
1643 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
1551 mm
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
870 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
|
Payload
365 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
70 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.90 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
164 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
|
Torque
92 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
51 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Fiat
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the Fiat Panda offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.