VS

Fiat Tipo Hatchback vs Skoda Octavia Combi comparison

Compare performance (130 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (19,700 £ vs 25,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Tipo Hatchback or Skoda Octavia Combi?

Fiat Tipo Hatchback vs Skoda Octavia Combi: Key differences

Fiat Tipo Hatchback

  • markedly cheaper
details

Skoda Octavia Combi

3.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • barely more efficient
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tipo Hatchback

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Fiat Tipo Hatchback is markedly cheaper – starting at 19,700 £ , while the Skoda Octavia Combi costs 25,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,872 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Octavia Combi uses 4.4 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Fiat Tipo Hatchback with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

Octavia Combi

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers noticeably more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 74 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Octavia Combi is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 6.7 s, while the Fiat Tipo Hatchback takes 8.8 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Octavia Combi delivers moderately more torque with 360 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.

Tipo Hatchback

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is very slightly lighter – 1,366 kg compared to 1,415 kg. The difference is around 49 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers markedly more boot space – 640 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 200 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Octavia Combi carries clearly more – 534 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 109 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Octavia Combi is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,600
Octavia Combi

Skoda Octavia Combi

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6.9 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Octavia Combi
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
The Skoda Octavia Combi and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports are two of the most practical estate cars on the market, each promising roomy cabins and sensible running costs for families and commuters. This comparison focuses on cargo space, fuel efficiency, driving dynamics and overall value to …
Skoda Octavia Combi
VW Golf Variant
VS
If your shopping list includes a boot that can swallow flat-pack furniture and weekend sports equipment without complaint, the Skoda Octavia Estate is the sensible giant with massive practicality and smart value, while the VW Golf Estate packages similar underpinnings into a neater, more refined …
Fiat Tipo Hatchback
Skoda Octavia Combi

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Fiat Tipo Hatchback

The Fiat Tipo is a sensible, spacious hatchback that prides itself on practical charm and everyday usability, perfect for buyers who want straightforward value rather than runway drama. It won’t turn heads for flash, but its comfortable ride, clever interior space and low-stress nature make it a smart, grown-up choice with a wink of character.

details
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_Hatchback_08
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_Hatchback_09
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_Hatchback_10
13_Tipo Cross

Reviews Fiat Tipo Hatchback

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Octavia Combi

The Skoda Octavia Combi is the sensible family wagon that somehow turns grocery runs and long trips into a pleasant, unshowy experience — spacious, practical and built like it prefers reliability over flash. With smart touches, clever storage and a cabin that feels grown-up rather than frugal, it’s an easy recommendation for buyers who want maximum utility without sacrificing comfort or style.

details
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_Dynamisch_116407
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_Dynamisch_116406
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_Dynamisch_116402
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_e_TEC_116372

Reviews Skoda Octavia Combi

3.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
Andrzej
12 May 2026, 15:17:48

Great car with a dynamic 1.5 engine and a 7-speed automatic; a downside is the electronics, which often shut off—terrible when reversing!!! It could also have a bigger tank because it averages 7 liters and at most 700 km.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Octavia Combi
VW Passat
VS
Comparing the Skoda Octavia Estate and the Volkswagen Passat is a classic choice between maximum practicality and a more polished driving experience. The Octavia Estate typically wins on cargo space and value-for-money, while the Passat leans toward a quieter, more premium cabin and composed …
Skoda Octavia Combi
VW Touran
VS
Family-hauling face-off: the Skoda Octavia Combi brings sleek looks, a big boot and crisp road manners, while the VW Touran counters with seven seats, sliding practicality and that boxy charm only an MPV can wear proudly. If you crave car-like drive and great value, go Octavia; if school runs and …
Kia Ceed Sportswagon
Skoda Octavia Combi
VS
Family-hauling face-off: the Kia Ceed Sportswagon serves big spec, a sweet drive and a long warranty for hatchback money, while the Skoda Octavia Estate counters with limo-like rear legroom, a cavernous boot and a more polished ride. If you prize value and low running costs, pick the Kia; if space, …
BMW 3 Series Touring
Skoda Octavia Combi
VS
The BMW 3 Series Touring and the Skoda Octavia Estate are both practical estate cars, but they target very different buyers: the 3 Series Touring delivers sharper handling, a premium interior and stronger brand cachet, while the Octavia Estate prioritises interior space, low running costs and sheer …
Skoda Octavia Combi
Skoda Octavia Limousine
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Octavia Estate and the Skoda Octavia Sedan largely comes down to whether you prioritise cargo space and practicality or a cleaner, more traditional booted silhouette. Mechanically they’re very similar — same engines, tech and driving character — but the Estate delivers …
Skoda Octavia Combi
Toyota Corolla
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Octavia Combi and the Toyota Corolla is essentially a choice between roomy, practical estate capability and compact, dependable efficiency. Below I’ll outline where each car excels and which type of buyer will get the most from it.
Honda Civic
Skoda Octavia Combi
VS
The Honda Civic and the Skoda Octavia Combi represent two distinct approaches to the practical car: the Civic emphasizes sharper handling and a more compact, driver-focused package, while the Octavia Combi prioritizes interior space and load-carrying versatility. This comparison will focus on how …
Skoda Octavia Combi
Volvo V60
VS
Unsure whether the Skoda Octavia Combi or the Volvo V60 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Fiat Tipo Hatchback
Skoda Octavia Combi

Costs and Consumption
Price
19,700 - 25,700 £
Price
25,600 - 39,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
122 - 125 g/km
co2
113 - 157 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,415 - 1,425 kg
Curb weight
1,366 - 1,553 kg
Trunk capacity
440 L
Trunk capacity
640 L
Length
4,368 mm
Length
-
Width
1,792 mm
Width
1,829 mm
Height
1,495 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
425 kg
Payload
502 - 534 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 HP
Power HP
116 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.8 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 10.7 s
Max Speed
207 - 208 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 - 320 Nm
Torque
220 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
96 kW
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
1,469 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
Brand
Fiat
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the Fiat Tipo Hatchback?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.