VS

Ford Bronco vs Mitsubishi Colt comparison

Compare performance (335 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (58,200 £ vs 18,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Bronco or Mitsubishi Colt?

Ford Bronco vs Mitsubishi Colt: Key differences

Ford Bronco

  • clearly more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space

Mitsubishi Colt

  • considerably cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably lighter

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Bronco

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi Colt is considerably cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Ford Bronco costs 58,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 40,080 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Colt uses 4.2 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Bronco with 11.3 L/100km. The difference is about 7.1 L/100km.

Colt

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Bronco offers clearly more power – delivering 335 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 192 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Bronco is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.7 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Bronco delivers considerably more torque with 563 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 403 Nm more.

Bronco

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is considerably lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 2,289 kg. The difference is around 1,100 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Bronco offers markedly more boot space – 562 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 171 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Bronco carries only slightly more – 411 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 26 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Colt is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £18,200
Colt

Mitsubishi Colt

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 91 - 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Ford Bronco
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Bronco

The Ford Bronco is a go-anywhere SUV that wraps rugged off-road capability in retro looks and modern tech, promising weekend warriors a grin from first mud splash to last campfire. With removable roofs and doors, a surprisingly polished cabin for everyday life and a wide range of trims, it’s as happy tackling trails as it is turning heads on the school run — adventure with attitude.

details

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

details
Ford Bronco
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption

Price
58,200 - 60,000 £
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
Consumption L/100km
11.3 - 12.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
257 - 288 g/km
co2
96 - 119 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,289 - 2,418 kg
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
Trunk capacity
504 - 562 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Length
-
Length
4,053 mm
Width
1,928 - 1,937 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Height
-
Height
1,439 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
Payload
387 - 411 kg
Payload
381 - 385 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
335 HP
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 7.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
174 km/h
Torque
563 Nm
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
246 kW
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
2,694 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General

Model Year
2,023
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.