VS

Ford Bronco vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison

Compare performance (335 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (58,200 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Bronco or Mitsubishi Space Star?

Ford Bronco vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences

Ford Bronco

  • substantially more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably more trunk space
details

Mitsubishi Space Star

3.8 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Bronco

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mitsubishi Space Star is substantially cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Ford Bronco costs 58,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 46,594 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Bronco with 11.3 L/100km. The difference is about 6.4 L/100km.

Space Star

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Bronco offers substantially more power – delivering 335 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 264 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Bronco is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.7 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 7.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Bronco delivers considerably more torque with 563 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 461 Nm more.

Bronco

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is considerably lighter – 940 kg compared to 2,289 kg. The difference is around 1,349 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Bronco offers considerably more boot space – 562 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 327 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Bronco carries only slightly more – 411 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £11,600
Space Star

Mitsubishi Space Star

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 71 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Fiat 500
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the realm of compact cars, the Fiat 500 and Mitsubishi Space Star offer distinct yet enticing options for urban drivers. The Fiat 500, with its iconic retro design and nimble handling, appeals to those who prioritize style and city maneuverability. On the other hand, the Mitsubishi Space Star …
Kia Picanto
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
Kia Picanto and Mitsubishi Space Star go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Ford Bronco
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Bronco

The Ford Bronco is a go-anywhere SUV that wraps rugged off-road capability in retro looks and modern tech, promising weekend warriors a grin from first mud splash to last campfire. With removable roofs and doors, a surprisingly polished cabin for everyday life and a wide range of trims, it’s as happy tackling trails as it is turning heads on the school run — adventure with attitude.

details
FordBronco_CGrey_Dynamic_5-LOW
FordBronco_HPRed_Static_V9-LOW
2023_FORD_BRONCO_BADLANDS_03-LOW
2023_FORD_BRONCO_BADLANDS_04-LOW
2023_FORD_BRONCO_BADLANDS__INTERIOR_28-LOW

Reviews Ford Bronco

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
DSC_2683_low
DSC_6272_low
DSC_8755_low
050_low

Reviews Mitsubishi Space Star

3.8 (1 Reviews)
rate
Bernard
19 May 2026, 19:43:01

Mitsubishi is more reliable brand, also the mirage /space star is more Fuel efficient than dacia Sandero

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mitsubishi Colt
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Mitsubishi Colt and Mitsubishi Space Star offer unique appeals to different drivers. The Colt shines with its sporty design and responsive handling, making it an exciting choice for urban driving. Meanwhile, the Space Star prioritizes practicality and fuel …
Mitsubishi Space Star
Toyota Aygo
VS
In the competitive realm of compact city cars, the Mitsubishi Space Star and Toyota Aygo stand out with their unique blend of style and efficiency. The Space Star offers a surprisingly spacious interior and excellent fuel economy, making it a practical choice for urban driving. Meanwhile, the Aygo …
Mitsubishi Space Star
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Mitsubishi Space Star, known for its spacious interior and fuel efficiency, caters well to urban drivers seeking practicality without sacrificing comfort. On the other hand, the Toyota Yaris stands out with its dynamic handling and advanced safety features, appealing to those who prioritize a …
Hyundai i10
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the battle of compact city cars, the Hyundai i10 impresses with its stylish design and user-friendly tech features, making it a top choice for urban drivers. On the other hand, the Mitsubishi Space Star offers a spacious interior and exceptional fuel efficiency, catering well to those seeking …
Hyundai i20
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the compact hatchback segment, the Hyundai i20 stands out with its modern design and tech-savvy interior, offering features that cater to tech enthusiasts. In contrast, the Mitsubishi Space Star provides practicality and excellent fuel efficiency, making it an appealing choice for …
Dacia Sandero
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the battle of budget-friendly hatchbacks, the Dacia Sandero stands out with its robust build, offering generous interior space and modern infotainment features at an unbeatable price. Meanwhile, the Mitsubishi Mirage (known as the Space Star in European markets) appeals to urban drivers with its …
Fiat Panda
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
When pitting the Fiat Panda against the Mitsubishi Space Star, city driving enthusiasts will find distinct advantages in each. The Fiat Panda impresses with its compact design and playful demeanor, making it an ideal choice for navigating tight urban spaces with ease. Meanwhile, the Mitsubishi …
Ford Bronco
Mercedes G-Class
VS
Ford Bronco and Mercedes G-Class go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Ford Bronco
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption
Price
58,200 - 60,000 £
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Consumption L/100km
11.3 - 12.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
257 - 288 g/km
co2
112 - 125 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,289 - 2,418 kg
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Trunk capacity
504 - 562 L
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Length
-
Length
3,845 mm
Width
1,928 - 1,937 mm
Width
1,665 mm
Height
-
Height
1,505 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Payload
387 - 411 kg
Payload
359 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
335 HP
Power HP
71 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 7.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Torque
563 Nm
Torque
102 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
246 kW
Power kW
52 kW
Engine capacity
2,694 cm3
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3

General
Model Year
2023
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mitsubishi
Is the Ford Bronco offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Bronco is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.