VS

Ford Bronco vs Nissan X-Trail comparison

Compare performance (335 HP vs 213 HP), boot space and price (58,200 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Bronco or Nissan X-Trail?

Ford Bronco vs Nissan X-Trail: Key differences

Ford Bronco

  • clearly more power
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Nissan X-Trail

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • visibly lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Bronco

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Nissan X-Trail is substantially cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Ford Bronco costs 58,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24,085 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan X-Trail uses 5.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Bronco with 11.3 L/100km. The difference is about 5.6 L/100km.

X-Trail

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Bronco offers clearly more power – delivering 335 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Bronco is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 6.7 s, while the Nissan X-Trail takes 7 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Bronco delivers marginally more torque with 563 Nm compared to 525 Nm. That’s about 38 Nm more.

Bronco

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan X-Trail is visibly lighter – 1,668 kg compared to 2,289 kg. The difference is around 621 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan X-Trail offers very slightly more boot space – 585 L compared to 562 L. That’s a difference of about 23 L.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan X-Trail carries visibly more – 574 kg compared to 411 kg. That’s a difference of about 163 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan X-Trail is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
X-Trail

Nissan X-Trail

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 163 - 213 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Ford Bronco
Nissan X-Trail

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Bronco

The Ford Bronco is a go-anywhere SUV that wraps rugged off-road capability in retro looks and modern tech, promising weekend warriors a grin from first mud splash to last campfire. With removable roofs and doors, a surprisingly polished cabin for everyday life and a wide range of trims, it’s as happy tackling trails as it is turning heads on the school run — adventure with attitude.

details

Nissan X-Trail

The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.

details
Ford Bronco
Nissan X-Trail

Costs and Consumption

Price
58,200 - 60,000 £
Price
34,200 - 50,500 £
Consumption L/100km
11.3 - 12.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
257 - 288 g/km
co2
131 - 161 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,289 - 2,418 kg
Curb weight
1,668 - 1,961 kg
Trunk capacity
504 - 562 L
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,928 - 1,937 mm
Width
1,840 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
387 - 411 kg
Payload
432 - 574 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
335 HP
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 7.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
563 Nm
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
246 kW
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
Engine capacity
2,694 cm3
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3

General

Model Year
2023
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.