Compare performance (280 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (27,500 £ vs 18,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Focus or Mitsubishi Colt?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mitsubishi Colt is substantially cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Ford Focus costs 27,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,352 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Colt uses 4.2 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Ford Focus with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Focus offers considerably more power – delivering 280 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 137 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Focus is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Ford Focus is markedly faster – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Colt tops out at 174 km/h. The difference is around 76 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Focus delivers substantially more torque with 420 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 260 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is moderately lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,330 kg. The difference is around 141 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Focus offers marginally more boot space – 392 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 1 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Ford Focus offers visibly more capacity – up to 1,354 L, about 285 L more than the Mitsubishi Colt.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Focus carries visibly more – 560 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 175 kg.
The Ford Focus is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Focus remains a clever all‑rounder that balances sharp handling with everyday comfort, making it a strong choice whether your commute is city streets or country lanes. Its practical cabin and sensible running costs mean you’ll spend more time enjoying the drive and less time worrying about ownership, with a playful streak underfoot that keeps things interesting.
detailsThe Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,500 - 42,700 £
|
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
117 - 183 g/km
|
co2
96 - 119 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
52 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,529 kg
|
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
392 L
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
|
|
Length
4,382 - 4,397 mm
|
Length
4,053 mm
|
|
Width
1,825 - 1,844 mm
|
Width
1,798 mm
|
|
Height
1,438 - 1,482 mm
|
Height
1,439 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,354 L
|
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
|
|
Payload
495 - 560 kg
|
Payload
381 - 385 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 11.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
186 - 250 km/h
|
Max Speed
174 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 420 Nm
|
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 206 kW
|
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 2,261 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|