Compare performance (243 HP vs 350 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 51,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Volvo V60?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the world of modern automobiles, choosing between a versatile SUV and a stylish wagon brings unique considerations. Today, we put the Ford Kuga and Volvo V60 under the spotlight, comparing their technical aspects and innovations. Which one aligns with your expectations for 2024? Dive in to find out.
Let's start under the hood where the power and performance meet expectations. The Ford Kuga offers a range of engine options, including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid versions, with power outputs ranging from 150 to 243 HP. The electric range on the plug-in hybrid model can go up to 69 km, thanks to its 14.4 kWh battery.
In contrast, the Volvo V60 is equipped with petrol mild hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and even a diesel option. The power spectrum is broader, stretching from 197 to a compelling 455 HP. Notably, its plug-in hybrid variant offers an impressive electric range of 92 km supported by a slightly larger 14.7 kWh battery.
Transmission systems differ in these models. The Ford Kuga provides versatility with both manual and automatic options and includes a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT). Drive enthusiasts can choose between front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations, catering to a variety of road conditions.
Volvo V60 sticks to automatic transmission, offering both dual-clutch and standard automatic gearboxes. It also supports front-wheel and all-wheel drive, ensuring a smooth ride tailored to driver preference and terrain.
Body styles play a crucial role in a car's functionality. As an SUV, the Ford Kuga boasts a longer, higher, and wider profile with dimensions up to 4645mm in length, 1882mm in width, and 1681mm in height, providing ample room for passengers and their luggage. It offers a trunk capacity of 412 liters, sufficient for family expeditions.
The Volvo V60, true to its wagon design, extends its length to 4787mm while maintaining a sleek width of 1850mm and a lower height of approximately 1499mm. Its trunk swoops in with an impressive 519 liters of storage space, making it a practical choice for those who value cargo space in a compact form.
The efficiency of a vehicle is a crucial factor for today's eco-conscious drivers. The Ford Kuga impresses with its CO2 emissions as low as 20 g/km in hybrid mode and fuel consumption as low as 0.9 L/100km. This model showcases Ford’s commitment to lowering the environmental impact.
Volvo V60 matches this with a CO2 output of 17 g/km and a fuel consumption rate of 0.7 L/100km in the plug-in hybrid model. The emphasis here is on combining performance with sustainability, aligning with Volvo's vision for innovative environmental solutions.
Ultimately, your choice between the Ford Kuga and Volvo V60 hinges on personal needs and priorities. The Kuga's SUV charm offers versatility and robust performance ideal for families and adventurers. Meanwhile, the V60’s elegance, power variation, and cargo-friendly design appeal to those seeking sophistication with utility.
Both come with their unique strengths, embodying the spirit of modern engineering and design. With 2024 models rolling out, potential buyers are indeed spoilt for choice!
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Kuga is clearly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Volvo V60 costs 51,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,178 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo V60 uses 2 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Kuga with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo V60 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 99 km, about 31 km more than the Ford Kuga.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V60 offers noticeably more power – delivering 350 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 107 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo V60 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.3 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo V60 delivers clearly more torque with 589 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 349 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is a bit lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 1,734 kg. The difference is around 208 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries barely more – 550 kg compared to 506 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.
The Volvo V60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.
details
The Volvo V60 blends elegant Scandinavian design with a practical estate layout, making it a composed and sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. Inside, a serene cabin, clever safety features and a supple ride turn daily commutes and weekend getaways into effortless, grown-up motoring.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
|
Price
51,400 - 62,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2 - 6.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
99 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
45 - 140 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
|
Curb weight
1,734 - 2,070 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,882 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
460 - 506 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 350 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 589 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 247 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España