Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Kuga vs Volvo V60 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (243 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (34200 £ vs 41600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Volvo V60?
Kuga
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Kuga has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £ , while the Volvo V60 costs 41600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7406 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo V60 manages with 2.40 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Ford Kuga with 2.80 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Volvo V60 performs distinct better – achieving up to 92 km, about 24 km more than the Ford Kuga.
V60
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V60 has a convincingly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 212 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo V60 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.30 s. That’s about 2.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Kuga performs minimal better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Volvo V60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo V60 pulls significantly stronger with 709 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 469 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kuga
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Kuga is somewhat lighter – 1526 kg compared to 1734 kg. The difference is around 208 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Volvo V60 offers distinct more room – 519 L compared to 412 L. That’s a difference of about 107 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Kuga performs slight better – up to 1534 L, which is about 103 L more than the Volvo V60.
When it comes to payload, Ford Kuga minimal takes the win – 550 kg compared to 506 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo V60 sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Kuga
Volvo V60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £41,600
Volvo V60
Ford Kuga
4.1 (4 Reviews)
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
details
Volvo V60
5 (1 Reviews)
The Volvo V60 blends elegant Scandinavian design with a practical estate layout, making it a composed and sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. Inside, a serene cabin, clever safety features and a supple ride turn daily commutes and weekend getaways into effortless, grown-up motoring.
details
Ford Kuga
Volvo V60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 46300 £
|
Price
41600 - 64200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 6.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
92 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
54 - 140 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1859 kg
|
Curb weight
1734 - 2064 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
412 L
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
|
Length
4604 - 4645 mm
|
Length
4778 mm
|
|
Width
1882 mm
|
Width
1850 mm
|
|
Height
1673 - 1681 mm
|
Height
1432 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1534 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1431 L
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
466 - 506 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1496 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drivetrain options does the Ford Kuga have?
The Ford Kuga is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.