VS

Ford Mustang Convertible vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison

Compare performance (446 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (56,900 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Convertible or Mitsubishi Space Star?

Ford Mustang Convertible vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences

Ford Mustang Convertible

  • substantially more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mitsubishi Space Star

3.8 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Convertible

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi Space Star is substantially cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Ford Mustang Convertible costs 56,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 45,266 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Mustang Convertible with 12.3 L/100km. The difference is about 7.4 L/100km.

Space Star

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Convertible offers substantially more power – delivering 446 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 375 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Convertible is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 9.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Convertible delivers significantly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 438 Nm more.

Mustang Convertible

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mitsubishi Space Star offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,876 kg. The difference is around 936 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi Space Star carries a bit more – 400 kg compared to 324 kg. That’s a difference of about 76 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Space Star holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £11,600
Space Star

Mitsubishi Space Star

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 71 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Ford Mustang Convertible
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Convertible

The Ford Mustang Convertible makes every drive feel like a small celebration, its exhaust note and open-air drama turning mundane routes into showstoppers. It’s a car that doubles as a weekend mood lifter and a credible everyday companion, blending swagger with surprising practicality.

details

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
Ford Mustang Convertible
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption

Price
56,900 - 59,900 £
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Consumption L/100km
12.3 - 12.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
280 - 282 g/km
co2
112 - 125 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Convertible
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,876 kg
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Length
-
Length
3,845 mm
Width
1,916 mm
Width
1,665 mm
Height
-
Height
1,505 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Payload
319 - 324 kg
Payload
359 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
446 HP
Power HP
71 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 - 5.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Torque
540 Nm
Torque
102 Nm
Number of Cylinders
8
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
328 kW
Power kW
52 kW
Engine capacity
5,038 cm3
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.