Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Coupe vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison
Compare performance (453 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (51,800 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Coupe or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Mustang Coupe
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is slightly cheaper – starting at 43,300 £ , while the Ford Mustang Coupe costs 51,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,486 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses 3.7 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Mustang Coupe with 12 L/100km. The difference is about 8.3 L/100km.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Coupe offers substantially more power – delivering 453 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 184 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Coupe is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.2 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.
Both models offer the same torque – 540 Nm.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is barely lighter – 1,792 kg compared to 1,808 kg. The difference is around 16 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers somewhat more boot space – 472 L compared to 381 L. That’s a difference of about 91 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries considerably more – 600 kg compared to 334 kg. That’s a difference of about 266 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £43,300
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Ford Mustang Coupe
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Coupe
The Ford Mustang Coupe wears its muscle on its sleeve, delivering a raw, grin-inducing driving experience that turns everyday roads into a little theater of noise and swagger. Inside it's surprisingly livable for regular use, so if you want headline-grabbing looks and a proper driver's car without pretending to be a luxury cruiser, the Mustang coupe is a very entertaining choice.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Ford Mustang Coupe
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
51,800 - 65,600 £
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
12 - 12.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
275 - 282 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
61 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Coupe
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
2
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,808 - 1,837 kg
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
381 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4,810 - 4,819 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,916 - 1,917 mm
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
|
Height
1,398 - 1,404 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
327 - 334 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
446 - 453 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 5.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
250 - 263 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
540 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
8
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
328 - 334 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
5,038 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.