VS

Omoda 5 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Omoda 5 or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Omoda 5 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43300 £. That’s a price difference of around 20143 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque manages with 3.70 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Omoda 5 with 7.50 L. The difference is about 3.80 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a distinct edge – offering 269 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 65 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 7.20 s, while the Omoda 5 takes 7.80 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Omoda 5 performs slight better – reaching 220 km/h, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque tops out at 213 km/h. The difference is around 7 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque pulls significantly stronger with 540 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers clearly more room – 472 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 472 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque performs minimal better – up to 1156 L, which is about 81 L more than the Omoda 5.

Who wins the race?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £43,300
RR_EVQ_20MY_Dynamic_ND_221118_02_big

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 160 - 269 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.7 - 7.8 L
  • Electric Range : 60 km
details

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a striking addition to the automotive market, offering a sleek and modern design that is sure to turn heads. Its interior is crafted with high-quality materials, providing both comfort and a sense of luxury. The vehicle delivers an impressive driving experience with its cutting-edge technology and responsive handling, making it a strong contender in its segment.

details

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1 (1)
rate

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque combines refined luxury with robust off-road capabilities. Its sleek design and high-quality interior materials create an elegant yet comfortable driving experience. Advanced technology features and superior handling make it a versatile choice for both city and countryside adventures.

details
RR_EVQ_20MY_Dynamic_ND_221118_02_big @ media.landrover.com
067rrevq20mysilverdynamic045 @ media.landrover.com
Range Rover Evoque Plug-In Hybrid_MJ20jpg (15) @ media.landrover.com
RR_EVQ_21MY_INTERIOR_260820_S44_03 @ media.landrover.com

Similar Comparisons

BYD Seal U
Omoda 5
VS
In the rapidly evolving electric vehicle market, the BYD Seal U and Omoda 5 present compelling options for eco-conscious drivers. The BYD Seal U boasts a more spacious interior and advanced battery technology, offering longer range and faster charging times, making it an ideal choice for those seeking efficiency and comfort. On the other hand, the Omoda 5 stands out with its bold design and feature-rich infotainment system, appealing to tech-savvy individuals who prioritize style and connectivity in their driving experience.
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
The Omoda 5 and MG HS offer compelling choices in the competitive compact SUV segment, each bringing unique strengths to the table. The Omoda 5 impresses with its avant-garde design and tech-savvy interior, packed with features that appeal to modern, tech-oriented drivers. In contrast, the MG HS boasts a more robust engine lineup and a spacious, comfortable cabin, making it a great option for those who value performance and practicality.
Omoda 5
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption
Price
23100 £
Price
43300 - 64800 £
Consumption L/100km
7.50 L
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
co2
-
co2
85 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
51 L
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
-
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
Trunk capacity
0 L
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
4424 mm
Length
4371 mm
Width
1830 mm
Width
1900 mm
Height
1588 mm
Height
1649 mm
Max trunk capacity
1075 L
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
Payload
-
Payload
503 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 HP
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.80 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
220 km/h
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
Torque
290 Nm
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
145 kW
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Engine capacity
1598 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
Brand
Omoda
Brand
Land Rover

Similar Comparisons

BMW X1
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
Hyundai Tucson
Omoda 5
VS
In the rapidly evolving compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Omoda 5 showcase distinct strengths catering to diverse consumer needs. The Tucson impresses with its refined design, a suite of advanced safety features, and a reputation for reliability, positioning it as a versatile and family-friendly option. On the other hand, the Omoda 5 captivates with its bold styling, technology-rich interior, and competitive pricing, appealing to those looking for innovative flair and value for money.
Kia Sportage
Omoda 5
VS
Nissan Qashqai
Omoda 5
VS
In the realm of compact SUVs, the Nissan Qashqai and the Omoda 5 present a compelling matchup, each vying for dominance with their distinct attributes. The Qashqai, renowned for its reliability and refined driving dynamics, offers a well-rounded package with enhanced safety features and improved fuel efficiency. Meanwhile, the Omoda 5, with its bold design and innovative tech offerings, caters to those prioritizing style and advanced connectivity.
Kia Sportage
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
Ford Puma
Omoda 5
VS
In the fiercely competitive crossover market, the Ford Puma and the Omoda 5 each bring unique strengths to the table. The Ford Puma appeals with its dynamic driving experience and sporty design, making it a standout choice for those who prioritize performance and style. Meanwhile, the Omoda 5 impresses with its modern tech suite and spacious interior, catering to drivers seeking comfort and cutting-edge features for their urban adventures.
Omoda 5
Vauxhall Grandland
VS
Lexus LBX
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.