VS

Nissan Juke vs Omoda 5 comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 31,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Omoda 5?

Nissan Juke vs Omoda 5: Key differences

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
details

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Juke

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Nissan Juke is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Omoda 5 costs 31,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,243 £.

5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 offers clearly more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 5 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 5 delivers significantly more torque with 340 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 140 Nm more.

Juke

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is noticeably lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,710 kg. The difference is around 436 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan Juke offers a bit more boot space – 422 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 72 L.

When it comes to payload, the Omoda 5 carries clearly more – 536 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 109 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Omoda 5 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£31,628
5

Omoda 5

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 430 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
Nissan Juke
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the MG HS comes down to whether you want a compact crossover that prioritises bold styling and tech, or a more traditionally sized SUV that leans on space and refinement. Below is a clear, experience-based comparison to help match each model to your driving …
Nissan Juke
SEAT Arona
VS
The Nissan Juke and SEAT Arona are rival compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling, yet they take markedly different approaches to design, driving feel and practicality. This comparison highlights the key strengths and compromises of each so you can quickly decide …
Omoda 5
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The Omoda 5 and the MG 5 EV pit two different takes on compact family motoring against each other: the Omoda 5 delivers crossover styling, tech and a choice of powertrains, while the MG 5 EV is a practical, battery-electric estate focused on value and efficiency. If you favour bold design and a …
Kia Sportage
Omoda 5
VS
The Kia Sportage and the Omoda 5 go head-to-head in the compact SUV class, offering very different takes on style, technology and everyday practicality. This comparison will help you choose between the Sportage's proven comfort, refinement and broad dealer support and the Omoda 5's striking design, …
Omoda 5
Peugeot 2008
VS
The Omoda 5 and the Peugeot 2008 are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want stylish urban SUVs with modern tech—Omoda 5 focuses on bold design and strong equipment-for-the-price, while the 2008 leans on European refinement and sharper handling. This comparison will help you decide whether you …
BYD Seal U
Omoda 5
VS
The BYD Seal U and Omoda 5 sit at different points of the market: the Seal U is a tech‑forward electric with strong range and efficiency, while the Omoda 5 is a stylish, value‑focused compact crossover. This comparison highlights real‑world driving, interior comfort, features and ownership costs so …
Nissan Juke
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 31,800 £
Price
31,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
430 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 136 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Curb weight
1,710 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
350 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,830 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
405 - 427 kg
Payload
536 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Power HP
204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 Nm
Torque
340 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Power kW
150 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Omoda
Is the Nissan Juke offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.