VS

Dacia Duster vs Omoda 5 – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Dacia Duster or Omoda 5?

Duster @ dacia-presse.de

The automotive landscape is ever-evolving, and with it comes the introduction of exciting new models designed to cater to diverse needs and preferences. Recently, the Dacia Duster and Omoda 5 have emerged as contenders in the compact SUV market. Both vehicles promise unique attributes, but which one reigns supreme? Let’s delve deeper into a comparison of these two impressive models.

Design and Dimensions

The Dacia Duster exudes a robust and rugged charm typical of its brand, featuring a solid and muscular stance. With dimensions of 4343 mm in length, 1813 mm in width, and a height of 1656 mm, it offers a commanding presence on the road. Conversely, the Omoda 5 exhibits a sleeker and more contemporary design. It measures 4424 mm in length, 1830 mm in width, and stands at 1588 mm tall, providing a blend of style and practicality.

Powertrain and Performance

When considering powertrain options, the Dacia Duster presents versatility with several offerings, including LPG, full hybrid, and petrol MHEV engines. Power outputs range from 91 HP to 140 HP, with torque varying between 160 Nm and 230 Nm. Its acceleration from 0-100 km/h varies from a respectable 9.9 seconds to a slower 14 seconds, depending on the variant chosen.

In contrast, the Omoda 5 is powered solely by a petrol engine that produces an impressive 204 HP and 290 Nm of torque. It showcases exhilarating performance with an acceleration time of just 7.8 seconds from 0-100 km/h, allowing it to easily outpace its rival in sheer speed. The top speed of the Omoda stands at 220 km/h, significantly higher than the Duster's maximum of 180 km/h.

Fuel Efficiency

Fuel efficiency is an essential consideration for any SUV. The Dacia Duster boasts a range of consumption figures, from a commendable 5 L/100 km to 8.1 L/100 km, ensuring that drivers can select a model that best fits their fuel economy requirements. Its fuel tank capacity ranges from 50 to 55 liters, allowing for extended journeys without frequent stops for refueling.

On the other hand, the Omoda 5 maintains a competitive consumption figure of 7.5 L/100 km with its petrol engine and has a fuel tank capacity of 51 liters. While slightly thirstier than some Duster variants, it makes up for this with its superior power and performance.

Interior and Comfort

Both models are designed to accommodate five passengers comfortably. The Duster, with trunk capacities ranging from 430 to 517 liters, offers ample space for storage, making it a practical choice for families or road-trippers. Its interior is straightforward but functional, emphasizing utility over luxury.

In contrast, the Omoda 5 may come with a more upscale interior design, providing a touch of elegance to the driving experience. However, specific trunk capacity details for the Omoda remain unclear, focusing instead on overall passenger comfort and digital features that enhance convenience.

Innovations and Technological Features

The Dacia Duster comes equipped with a variety of technical innovations, including advanced safety features and an intuitive infotainment system that keeps occupants connected on the road. Depending on the trim level, additional driver-assist technologies may also be available, enhancing both safety and comfort.

On the technological front, the Omoda 5 likely embraces a modern infotainment setup with advanced connectivity options, aiming to compete with the best in class. While specific tech offerings remain to be detailed, the emphasis on user-friendly interfaces and smart technology integration is expected to be a focal point for the brand.

Conclusion

The decision between the Dacia Duster and Omoda 5 ultimately hinges on personal preferences and requirements. The Duster shines with its versatility, efficient engine choices, and practicality, making it a solid option for budget-conscious buyers. Meanwhile, the Omoda 5 stands out in performance and modern design, appealing to those seeking a dynamic driving experience and cutting-edge technology. Whether you prioritize rugged reliability or stylish performance, both models offer compelling choices in the increasingly competitive SUV market.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Dacia Duster has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16300 £, while the Omoda 5 costs 23100 £. That’s a price difference of around 6865 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Dacia Duster manages with 5 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Omoda 5 with 7.50 L. The difference is about 2.50 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 has a distinct edge – offering 204 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 64 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 5 is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 7.80 s, while the Dacia Duster takes 9.90 s. That’s about 2.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Omoda 5 performs a bit better – reaching 220 km/h, while the Dacia Duster tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Omoda 5 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 290 Nm compared to 230 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of boot space, the Dacia Duster offers convincingly more room – 517 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 517 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Dacia Duster performs evident better – up to 1609 L, which is about 534 L more than the Omoda 5.

Who wins the race?

The Dacia Duster proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Dacia Duster is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £16,300
d220402p

Dacia Duster

  • Engine Type : LPG, Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 91 - 140 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5 - 7.6 L
details

Dacia Duster

5 (1)
rate

The Dacia Duster represents a compelling choice for those seeking an affordable yet robust SUV in the market. With its rugged design and practicality, it tackles both urban commutes and off-road adventures with ease. Inside, the vehicle offers a spacious cabin that ensures comfort, while maintaining its reputation for delivering excellent value for money.

details
d220402p @ dacia-presse.de
Dacia_Duster_2 @ dacia-presse.de
d220403p @ dacia-presse.de
d220404p @ dacia-presse.de

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a striking addition to the automotive market, offering a sleek and modern design that is sure to turn heads. Its interior is crafted with high-quality materials, providing both comfort and a sense of luxury. The vehicle delivers an impressive driving experience with its cutting-edge technology and responsive handling, making it a strong contender in its segment.

details

Similar Comparisons

Dacia Duster
Dacia Jogger
VS
The Dacia Duster is the rugged, no-nonsense compact SUV that feels ready for gravel tracks and weekend escapes without costing the earth — pick it if you want a bit of adventure in a brutally honest, affordable package. The Dacia Jogger, by contrast, is a clever, spacious seven-seater that trades off-road bravado for family-friendly practicality and impressive value, perfect if you need seats and cargo rather than swagger.
Dacia Duster
VW Taigo
VS
In an intriguing showdown between the Dacia Duster and the VW Taigo, the Duster shines with its rugged build and exceptional off-road capabilities, offering great value for adventurous drivers. The VW Taigo, on the other hand, boasts sleek design and advanced technological features, catering to those who seek a stylish and connected urban ride. Both models present compelling choices, appealing to different aspects of driving pleasure and utility.
Dacia Duster
Omoda 5
Duster

Costs and Consumption
Price
16300 - 24800 £
Price
23100 £
Consumption L/100km
5 - 7.6 L
Consumption L/100km
7.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
113 - 148 g/km
co2
-
Fuel tank capacity
49 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1351 - 1465 kg
Curb weight
-
Trunk capacity
430 - 517 L
Trunk capacity
0 L
Length
4343 mm
Length
4424 mm
Width
1813 mm
Width
1830 mm
Height
1656 - 1661 mm
Height
1588 mm
Max trunk capacity
1545 - 1609 L
Max trunk capacity
1075 L
Payload
414 - 430 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
LPG, Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
91 - 140 HP
Power HP
204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 14 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.80 s
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
Max Speed
220 km/h
Torque
160 - 230 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
67 - 104 kW
Power kW
145 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
Brand
Dacia
Brand
Omoda

Similar Comparisons

Dacia Duster
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
The Dacia Duster is the sensible new-school pick — affordable, economical and surprisingly well packaged with modern safety and infotainment for the money; the Opel Frontera, meanwhile, is a proper old-school body-on-frame bruiser that still appeals to buyers who prize simple, rugged off-road ability and don’t mind rough edges. If you want a trouble-free everyday SUV that feels like a smart purchase, take the Duster; if you crave raw 4x4 character for weekend trails and enjoy tinkering, the Frontera is the charming, slightly dusty alternative.
Dacia Duster
Dacia Sandero
VS
In the battle between the Dacia Duster and the Dacia Sandero, potential buyers must weigh practicality against compact efficiency. The Duster, with its robust SUV-like design and off-road capabilities, offers more versatility for adventurous drivers, while the Sandero shines as a budget-friendly hatchback that's perfect for urban commuting. Both models deliver outstanding value, but your choice ultimately hinges on the lifestyle needs they fulfill.
Dacia Duster
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Dacia Duster and Skoda Karoq emerge as strong contenders, each catering to distinct buyer preferences. The Duster offers an impressive value proposition with its rugged design and practical features, making it an ideal choice for budget-conscious adventurers. Meanwhile, the Karoq impresses with its refined interior, advanced technology, and dynamic handling, appealing to those seeking a more premium driving experience.
Dacia Duster
Dacia Bigster
VS
In the battle of robust and budget-friendly SUVs, the Dacia Duster and the upcoming Dacia Bigster each offer unique appeals for the adventurous driver. The Dacia Duster, renowned for its impressive off-road capabilities and affordability, has long been a favorite among cost-conscious explorers. However, the Dacia Bigster, set to redefine the brand's footprint with its larger size and potential hybrid engine options, promises a fresh blend of ruggedness and innovation aimed at those looking for more space and versatility without breaking the bank.
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
The Omoda 5 and MG HS offer compelling choices in the competitive compact SUV segment, each bringing unique strengths to the table. The Omoda 5 impresses with its avant-garde design and tech-savvy interior, packed with features that appeal to modern, tech-oriented drivers. In contrast, the MG HS boasts a more robust engine lineup and a spacious, comfortable cabin, making it a great option for those who value performance and practicality.
BYD Seal U
Omoda 5
VS
In the rapidly evolving electric vehicle market, the BYD Seal U and Omoda 5 present compelling options for eco-conscious drivers. The BYD Seal U boasts a more spacious interior and advanced battery technology, offering longer range and faster charging times, making it an ideal choice for those seeking efficiency and comfort. On the other hand, the Omoda 5 stands out with its bold design and feature-rich infotainment system, appealing to tech-savvy individuals who prioritize style and connectivity in their driving experience.
Citroen C3 Aircross
Dacia Duster
VS
In the fiercely competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Citroen C3 Aircross stands out with its bold design and customizable interior options, appealing to urban drivers seeking both style and practicality. Meanwhile, the Dacia Duster offers remarkable value for money, boasting robust off-road capabilities and a spacious cabin that caters to families and adventurous spirits alike. Ultimately, the choice between these two models hinges on whether buyers prioritize flair and urban versatility or rugged functionality and affordability.
Dacia Duster
Suzuki Vitara
VS
In the competitive crossover market, the Dacia Duster and Suzuki Vitara stand out for their practicality and value. The Duster offers an exceptional amount of space and rugged off-road capabilities, making it a great choice for adventurous drivers. Meanwhile, the Vitara impresses with its stylish design, advanced safety features, and agile handling, appealing to those seeking a more refined urban experience.
What drivetrain options does the Dacia Duster have?

The Dacia Duster is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.