Compare performance (158 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (16,300 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Dacia Duster or Suzuki S-Cross?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the competitive SUV market, the Dacia Duster and Suzuki S-Cross stand as compelling choices for buyers seeking practicality, efficiency, and modern features. Both vehicles have their distinct accolades, making them noteworthy contenders for anyone looking to purchase an SUV. Let's dive into a thorough comparison of the 2024 models of both vehicles.
The Dacia Duster boasts an array of engine options, which includes LPG, full hybrid, and petrol mild hybrid variants, making it a versatile choice for different driving preferences. With power outputs ranging from 91 HP to 140 HP, it offers decent performance across the board. The top model reaches a 0-100 km/h acceleration in as little as 9.9 seconds and can achieve a maximum speed of 180 km/h.
On the other hand, the Suzuki S-Cross features full hybrid and petrol mild hybrid engines that provide robust performance as well, with outputs between 116 HP and 129 HP. Interestingly, the S-Cross excels in acceleration, hitting 0-100 km/h in just 9.5 seconds while reaching a top speed of up to 195 km/h in its higher variants. Both vehicles come with manual and automatic transmission options, ensuring drivers can choose their preferred driving experience.
Fuel efficiency is a critical consideration in today's eco-conscious market. The Dacia Duster exhibits a range of consumption figures, with the most economical variant achieving just 5 L/100 km, while others realign around the 6.1 L mark. Meanwhile, the S-Cross offers an impressive consumption rate of 5.1 L/100 km, positioning it as one of the more fuel-efficient options in its class.
In terms of emissions, the Duster's CO2 figures range from 114 g/km to 147 g/km, depending on the variant chosen. Conversely, the S-Cross performs admirably well with CO2 emissions as low as 116 g/km. Thus, the S-Cross edges out slightly in offering a greener option without compromising performance.
Both SUVs are designed to accommodate five passengers comfortably, but their dimensions vary slightly. The Dacia Duster measures 4343 mm in length and 1813 mm in width, while the Suzuki S-Cross is slightly shorter at 4300 mm and narrower at 1785 mm. The Duster stands taller at 1656 mm compared to the S-Cross's height of 1580 mm.
Trunk capacity is another vital metric for families and active lifestyles. The Duster offers a substantial trunk space of 453 liters, significantly beating the S-Cross's 430 liters. This could make it a better option for those who require extra cargo space for weekend getaways or daily errands.
On the tech front, both vehicles come equipped with modern features aimed at enhancing driver comfort and safety. The Dacia Duster features advanced safety tech synonymous with its brand, while the Suzuki S-Cross leans heavily into hybrid technology and driver-assist features. Both vehicles prioritize passenger safety with stable chassis and multiple airbag systems.
The Dacia Duster has been fortified with innovations such as an LPG engine option that appeals to environmentally conscious buyers. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross features advanced hybrid technologies, enhancing its fuel efficiency while providing a seamless driving experience. The S-Cross’s hybridization not only helps in emissions but also optimizes performance by balancing power and efficiency.
Choosing between the Dacia Duster and the Suzuki S-Cross ultimately comes down to personal preferences. The Duster offers an appealing combination of size, practicality, and diverse engine options, making it a solid choice for families and adventure seekers alike. Meanwhile, the S-Cross shines in fuel efficiency and performance metrics, catering to drivers who value dynamic driving and lower environmental impact.
In summary, both the Dacia Duster and Suzuki S-Cross have their unique strengths and weaknesses. Interested buyers should consider their specific needs and prioritize features that align with their lifestyle.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Dacia Duster is markedly cheaper – starting at 16,300 £ , while the Suzuki S-Cross costs 21,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,485 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Dacia Duster uses 4.7 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Dacia Duster offers noticeably more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki S-Cross delivers marginally more torque with 235 Nm compared to 230 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is very slightly lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,377 kg. The difference is around 97 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Dacia Duster offers somewhat more boot space – 517 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 87 L.
When it comes to payload, the Dacia Duster carries slightly more – 453 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 48 kg.
The Dacia Duster stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Dacia Duster is a straightforward, budget-friendly SUV that prioritizes practicality and value over flashy features. Its rugged styling and simple, roomy interior make it a sensible choice for buyers who want capable everyday transport without paying for extras they won’t use.
details
The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
16,300 - 24,900 £
|
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 7.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
107 - 140 g/km
|
co2
119 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,377 - 1,559 kg
|
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 517 L
|
Trunk capacity
430 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,813 mm
|
Width
1,785 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
402 - 453 kg
|
Payload
395 - 405 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, LPG
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
110 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 - 11.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
190 - 230 Nm
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
81 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Dacia
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España