Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Jeep Compass comparison
Compare performance (487 HP vs 225 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Jeep Compass?
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Jeep Compass: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Jeep Compass is substantially cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,228 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Jeep Compass is very slightly more efficient: consuming 17.5 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 0.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 100 km more than the Jeep Compass.
Compass
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers significantly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 225 HP. That’s roughly 262 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8 s. That’s about 4.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers considerably more torque with 950 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 605 Nm more.
Mustang Mach-E
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Jeep Compass is visibly lighter – 1,667 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 494 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Jeep Compass offers very slightly more boot space – 550 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 31 L.
When it comes to payload, the Jeep Compass carries marginally more – 473 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 23 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Jeep Compass
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Jeep Compass
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Jeep Compass
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 127 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
472 - 473 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Jeep
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.