Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar comparison
Compare performance (487 HP vs 404 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 62,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Land Rover Range Rover Velar?
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Mustang Mach-E is visibly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 62,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,543 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers substantially more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 542 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.
Range Rover Velar
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers a bit more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 404 HP. That’s roughly 83 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers visibly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 650 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.
Mustang Mach-E
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Velar is very slightly lighter – 2,003 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 158 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers marginally more boot space – 552 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 33 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar carries noticeably more – 587 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 137 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
The Range Rover Velar marries sleek, pared-back styling with genuine off-road poise, so it looks at home in the city yet won’t flinch at rougher roads. Inside, a luxurious, tech-forward cabin pampers occupants while keeping the driving experience confidently in command — and yes, it somehow makes an SUV feel undeniably chic.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
Price
62,000 - 87,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 10 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
58 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
103 - 228 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
Curb weight
2,003 - 2,280 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
503 - 552 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
Width
1,933 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
460 - 587 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,997 - 2,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C, F
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.